MG ZT Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on MG ZT trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 400 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.9 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 80 L
    • Max trunk load: 93 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 CDTi : 3.4 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V Turbo : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.5 i V6 24V : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 4.6 i V8 32V : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 CDTi : 2.11 L/km-h (1.31 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V Turbo : 1.9 L/km-h (1.18 L/mph)
  • 2.5 i V6 24V : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 4.6 i V8 32V : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 CDTi : 69x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 51.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 i 16V Turbo : 51.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 4.6 i V8 32V : 30.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 CDTi 400 L 37 L to 1 s 6.2x 205x -78L
    1.8 i 16V 400 L 34 L to 1 s 6.2x 223x -78L
    1.8 i 16V Turbo 400 L 34 L to 1 s 6.2x 223x -78L
    2.5 i V6 24V 400 L 50 L to 1 s 6.2x 160x -78L
    4.6 i V8 32V 400 L 63 L to 1 s 6.1x 87x -78L
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTi
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 205x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 223x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 223x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 2.5 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 160x
    Difference with world average -78L
    Vehicle 4.6 i V8 32V
    Trunk space 400 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 87x
    Difference with world average -78L

    Quick notes on MG ZT trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 432 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 86.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 91 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 CDTi : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V Turbo : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.5 i V6 24V : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 4.6 i V8 32V : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 CDTi : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V Turbo : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • 2.5 i V6 24V : 2.01 L/km-h (1.25 L/mph)
  • 4.6 i V8 32V : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 CDTi : 74.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 55.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 i 16V Turbo : 55.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 i V6 24V : 39.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 4.6 i V8 32V : 32.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 CDTi 432 L 39 L to 1 s 6.6x 221x -46L
    1.8 i 16V 432 L 39 L to 1 s 6.6x 241x -46L
    1.8 i 16V Turbo 432 L 39 L to 1 s 6.6x 241x -46L
    2.5 i V6 24V 432 L 49 L to 1 s 6.6x 173x -46L
    4.6 i V8 32V 432 L 70 L to 1 s 6.6x 94x -46L
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTi
    Trunk space 432 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -46L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 432 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -46L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 432 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -46L
    Vehicle 2.5 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 432 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 173x
    Difference with world average -46L
    Vehicle 4.6 i V8 32V
    Trunk space 432 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 70 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -46L