Mini Clubman Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Mini Clubman trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 360 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.6 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 72 L
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.1 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • One 1.5 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • Cooper 1.5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • JCW 2.0 : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • One D 1.5 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • One 1.5 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • Cooper 1.5 : 1.77 L/km-h (1.1 L/mph)
  • JCW 2.0 : 1.45 L/km-h (0.9 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • One 1.5 : 65.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper 1.5 : 67.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 59x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • JCW 2.0 : 50.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 85.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One D 1.5 : 90x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 83.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    One 1.5 360 L 34 L to 1 s - 240x -118L
    Cooper 1.5 360 L 41 L to 1 s 7.5x 240x -118L
    Cooper S 2.0 360 L - 7.5x 180x -118L
    JCW 2.0 360 L 77 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    Cooper D 2.0 360 L 44 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    One D 1.5 360 L - 7.5x 241x -118L
    Cooper SD 2.0 360 L - 7.5x 180x -118L
    Vehicle One 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper S 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle JCW 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 77 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper D 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle One D 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper SD 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L

    Quick notes on Mini Clubman trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 360 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 72 L
      • Max trunk load: 83 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • One 1.5 : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • JCW 2.0 : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 1.5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0d : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • 1.5d : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • Cooper 1.5 : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • One D 1.5 : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • One 1.5 : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • JCW 2.0 : 1.51 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • 1.5 : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • 2.0d : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.5d : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • Cooper 1.5 : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • One D 1.5 : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • One 1.5 : 63.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • JCW 2.0 : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 : 70.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 58.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0d : 80x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 54.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 80x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5d : 94.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper 1.5 : 63.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One D 1.5 : 87.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 83.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    One 1.5 360 L 33 L to 1 s 7.5x 240x -118L
    JCW 2.0 360 L 60 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    1.5 360 L 42 L to 1 s 7.5x 240x -118L
    2.0 360 L 53 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    2.0d 360 L 51 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    Cooper S 2.0 360 L 52 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    Cooper SD 2.0 360 L 50 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    1.5d 360 L 36 L to 1 s 7.5x 241x -118L
    Cooper 1.5 360 L 41 L to 1 s 7.5x 240x -118L
    One D 1.5 360 L 35 L to 1 s 7.5x 241x -118L
    Cooper D 2.0 360 L 44 L to 1 s 7.5x 180x -118L
    Vehicle One 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle JCW 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle 2.0d
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper S 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper SD 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle 1.5d
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle One D 1.5
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average -118L
    Vehicle Cooper D 2.0
    Trunk space 360 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -118L

    Quick notes on Mini Clubman trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 260 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 52 L
      • Max trunk load: 72 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)
  • One 1.6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • JCW 1.6 : 1.2 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • One D 1.6 : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.27 L/km-h (0.79 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 1.38 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 1.33 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 1.15 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)
  • One 1.6 : 1.45 L/km-h (0.9 L/mph)
  • JCW 1.6 : 1.09 L/km-h (0.68 L/mph)
  • One D 1.6 : 1.43 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 49.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 51x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 50x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 40x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 44.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One 1.6 : 40x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • JCW 1.6 : 36.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One D 1.6 : 66.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    Cooper SD 2.0 260 L 31 L to 1 s 6.5x 130x -218L
    Cooper D 1.6 260 L 25 L to 1 s 6.5x 167x -218L
    Cooper D 2.0 260 L 26 L to 1 s 6.5x 130x -218L
    Cooper 1.6 260 L 25 L to 1 s 6.5x 163x -218L
    Cooper S 1.6 260 L 37 L to 1 s 5.2x 163x -218L
    One 1.6 260 L 21 L to 1 s 6.5x 163x -218L
    JCW 1.6 260 L 40 L to 1 s 5.2x 163x -218L
    One D 1.6 260 L 23 L to 1 s 6.5x 163x -218L
    Vehicle Cooper SD 2.0
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle Cooper D 1.6
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 167x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle Cooper D 2.0
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 130x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle Cooper 1.6
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle Cooper S 1.6
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle One 1.6
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle JCW 1.6
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -218L
    Vehicle One D 1.6
    Trunk space 260 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 163x
    Difference with world average -218L