cat_logo
HomeMini

Countryman

Mini Countryman Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Mini Countryman trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 440 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 88 L
    • Max trunk load: 90 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • Cooper 1.5 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • JCW 2.0 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • One 1.5 : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • One D 1.5 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • Cooper S E 1.5 : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • Cooper S E : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • Cooper 1.5 : 2.25 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 2.2 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)
  • JCW 2.0 : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • One 1.5 : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • One D 1.5 : 2.39 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • Cooper S E 1.5 : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • Cooper S E : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • Cooper 1.5 : 76.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 93.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S 2.0 : 69.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 93.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • JCW 2.0 : 65.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One 1.5 : 76.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One D 1.5 : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S E 1.5 : 168.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S E : 213.2x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    Cooper 1.5 450 L 49 L to 1 s 8.8x 300x -28L
    Cooper D 2.0 450 L 52 L to 1 s 8.8x 226x -28L
    Cooper S 2.0 450 L 63 L to 1 s 8.8x 225x -28L
    Cooper SD 2.0 450 L 63 L to 1 s 8.8x 226x -28L
    JCW 2.0 450 L 73 L to 1 s 8.8x 225x -28L
    One 1.5 450 L 39 L to 1 s 8.8x 300x -28L
    One D 1.5 450 L 42 L to 1 s 8.8x 301x -28L
    Cooper S E 1.5 405 L 62 L to 1 s 11.3x 270x -73L
    Cooper S E 405 L 62 L to 1 s 11.3x 270x -73L
    Vehicle Cooper 1.5
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle Cooper D 2.0
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 226x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle Cooper S 2.0
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 225x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle Cooper SD 2.0
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 226x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle JCW 2.0
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 225x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle One 1.5
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle One D 1.5
    Trunk space 450 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average -28L
    Vehicle Cooper S E 1.5
    Trunk space 405 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average -73L
    Vehicle Cooper S E
    Trunk space 405 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average -73L

    Quick notes on Mini Countryman trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 350 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 70 L
      • Max trunk load: 83 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • One 1.6 : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • One D 1.6 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • JCW 1.6 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • One 1.6 : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)
  • One D 1.6 : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 1.9 L/km-h (1.18 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 1.93 L/km-h (1.2 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 1.99 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.79 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)
  • JCW 1.6 : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • One 1.6 : 50.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One D 1.6 : 83.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 50x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 74.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 59.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 49.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 59.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • JCW 1.6 : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    One 1.6 350 L 27 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    One D 1.6 350 L 28 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper 1.6 350 L 32 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper D 1.6 350 L 32 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper D 2.0 350 L 31 L to 1 s 7.4x 175x -128L
    Cooper S 1.6 350 L 45 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper SD 2.0 350 L 39 L to 1 s 7.4x 175x -128L
    JCW 1.6 350 L 53 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Vehicle One 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle One D 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper D 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper D 2.0
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 175x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper S 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper SD 2.0
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 175x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle JCW 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L

    Quick notes on Mini Countryman trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 350 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 87.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 82 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • One 1.6 : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 1.9 L/hp (2.6 L/kW)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 3.1 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • One D 1.6 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 1.79 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • One 1.6 : 2.08 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 1.92 L/km-h (1.19 L/mph)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 1.94 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • One D 1.6 : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • Cooper SD 2.0 : 61.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 2.0 : 58.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One 1.6 : 48.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper 1.6 : 46.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper S 1.6 : 45.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cooper D 1.6 : 71.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • One D 1.6 : 79.5x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    Cooper SD 2.0 350 L 39 L to 1 s 7.4x 175x -128L
    Cooper D 2.0 350 L 31 L to 1 s 7.4x 175x -128L
    One 1.6 350 L 27 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper 1.6 350 L 32 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper S 1.6 350 L 44 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Cooper D 1.6 350 L 32 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    One D 1.6 350 L 28 L to 1 s 7.4x 219x -128L
    Vehicle Cooper SD 2.0
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 175x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper D 2.0
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 175x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle One 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper S 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle Cooper D 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L
    Vehicle One D 1.6
    Trunk space 350 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -128L