Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDI | 430 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 183x | -48L |
2.0 | 430 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.8x | 215x | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 215x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 676 L | 68 L to 1 s | 12.3x | 369x | +198L |
1.8 4x4 | 676 L | 62 L to 1 s | 12.3x | 369x | +198L |
2.0 16V | 676 L | 64 L to 1 s | 12.3x | 339x | +198L |
2.0 TD GLX | 676 L | 40 L to 1 s | 12.3x | 338x | +198L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 676 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 369x |
Difference with world average | +198L |
Vehicle | 1.8 4x4 |
Trunk space | 676 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 369x |
Difference with world average | +198L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 676 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 339x |
Difference with world average | +198L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD GLX |
Trunk space | 676 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 338x |
Difference with world average | +198L |