Mitsubishi Space Wagon Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Mitsubishi Space Wagon trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 240 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.3 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 2.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 40 L
    • Max trunk load: 96 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.4 GDi 16V : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 GDi 16V 4X4 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.4 GDi : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 3.0 GDi 24V : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 3.0 GDi 24V 4X4 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.4 GDi 16V : 1.26 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • 2.4 GDi 16V 4X4 : 1.3 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 1.33 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)
  • 3.0 GDi 24V : 1.33 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.4 GDi 16V : 25x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 GDi 16V 4X4 : 23.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.4 GDi 16V 240 L 22 L to 1 s 3.8x 102x -238L
    2.4 GDi 16V 4X4 240 L 20 L to 1 s 4.1x 102x -238L
    2.4 GDi 240 L - 3.8x 102x -238L
    2.0 i 16V 240 L 21 L to 1 s 3.8x 120x -238L
    3.0 GDi 24V 240 L - 3.8x 81x -238L
    3.0 GDi 24V 4X4 240 L - 4.1x 81x -238L
    Vehicle 2.4 GDi 16V
    Trunk space 240 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 102x
    Difference with world average -238L
    Vehicle 2.4 GDi 16V 4X4
    Trunk space 240 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 20 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 102x
    Difference with world average -238L
    Vehicle 2.4 GDi
    Trunk space 240 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 102x
    Difference with world average -238L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 240 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 120x
    Difference with world average -238L
    Vehicle 3.0 GDi 24V
    Trunk space 240 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 81x
    Difference with world average -238L
    Vehicle 3.0 GDi 24V 4X4
    Trunk space 240 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 81x
    Difference with world average -238L

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Space Wagon trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 212 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 4.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 30.3 L
      • Max trunk load: 84 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 GLXi 4x4 : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 GLXi : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 GLXi 4x4 : 1.18 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)
  • 2.0 GLXi : 1.15 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 GLXi 4x4 : 21.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 GLXi : 23.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 GLXi 4x4 212 L 18 L to 1 s 3.5x 106x -266L
    2.0 GLXi 212 L 20 L to 1 s 3.5x 106x -266L
    Vehicle 2.0 GLXi 4x4
    Trunk space 212 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 106x
    Difference with world average -266L
    Vehicle 2.0 GLXi
    Trunk space 212 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 20 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 106x
    Difference with world average -266L