Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 V6 | 195 L | - | 2.7x | 53x | -283L |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 195 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 53x |
Difference with world average | -283L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 V6 | 235 L | 48 L to 1 s | 3.3x | 64x | -243L |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 235 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 64x |
Difference with world average | -243L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 V6 | 235 L | 44 L to 1 s | 3.3x | 64x | -243L |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 235 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 64x |
Difference with world average | -243L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.7 V6 | 140 L | 25 L to 1 s | 1.9x | 38x | -338L |
Vehicle | 3.7 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 140 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 1.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 38x |
Difference with world average | -338L |