Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 | 490 L | - | 12x | 327x | +12L |
1.2i | 490 L | - | 12x | 409x | +12L |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 327x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | 1.2i |
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 12x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 409x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 500 L | 41 L to 1 s | 10x | 313x | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 313x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 440 L | 36 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 249x | -38L |
2.0 | 440 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 220x | -38L |
2.2 Di | 440 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 201x | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 249x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 220x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2.2 Di |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 d | 355 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 163x | -123L |
1.8 16V | 355 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 201x | -123L |
Vehicle | 2.2 d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V | 393 L | 37 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 222x | -85L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 393 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -85L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V | 393 L | 33 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 222x | -85L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 393 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -85L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 355 L | 29 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 201x | -123L |
1.8 16V | 355 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 201x | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 440 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 249x | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 249x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SLX | 440 L | 42 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 276x | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.6 SLX |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 276x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SR,SLX | 440 L | 42 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 276x | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.6 SR,SLX |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 276x |
Difference with world average | -38L |