cat_logo
HomeNissan

Patrol

Nissan Patrol Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Nissan Patrol trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 470 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.7 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 67.1 L
    • Max trunk load: 160 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.2 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 5.6 V8 : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 5.6 V8 : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 5.6 V8 : 32.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    5.6 V8 470 L 75 L to 1 s 3.4x 85x -8L
    Vehicle 5.6 V8
    Trunk space 470 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 85x
    Difference with world average -8L

    Quick notes on Nissan Patrol trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 708 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 15.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 7.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 101.1 L
      • Max trunk load: 136 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 4.2 TD : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 3.0 Di : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 3.0 Di 16V : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 2.8 GR : 6.3 L/hp (8.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 4.2 TD : 4.17 L/km-h (2.59 L/mph)
  • 3.0 Di : 4.91 L/km-h (3.05 L/mph)
  • 3.0 Di 16V : 3.79 L/km-h (2.36 L/mph)
  • 2.8 GR : 5.4 L/km-h (3.36 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 Di 16V : 56.2x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    4.2 TD 605 L - 6.4x 145x +127L
    3.0 Di 810 L - 8.5x 274x +332L
    3.0 Di 16V 607 L 38 L to 1 s 6.4x 206x +129L
    2.8 GR 810 L - 8.5x 287x +332L
    Vehicle 4.2 TD
    Trunk space 605 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 145x
    Difference with world average +127L
    Vehicle 3.0 Di
    Trunk space 810 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 274x
    Difference with world average +332L
    Vehicle 3.0 Di 16V
    Trunk space 607 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 206x
    Difference with world average +129L
    Vehicle 2.8 GR
    Trunk space 810 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 287x
    Difference with world average +332L