Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V | 465 L | 36 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 263x | -13L |
2.0 i 16V | 465 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 233x | -13L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 465 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | -13L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V | 450 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 254x | -28L |
2.0 i 16V | 450 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 225x | -28L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 254x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 225x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V | 450 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 254x | -28L |
2.0 i 16V | 450 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 225x | -28L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 254x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 225x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V | 490 L | 46 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 245x | +12L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 490 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +12L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V | 480 L | 51 L to 1 s | 8x | 240x | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V | 480 L | 51 L to 1 s | 8x | 240x | +2L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 480 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | +2L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i | 460 L | 49 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 230x | -18L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | -18L |