Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
38 kWh | 510 L | - | - | - | +32L |
Vehicle | 38 kWh |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 510 L | 47 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 284x | +32L |
1.6 | 510 L | 46 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 319x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 284x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 319x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 510 L | - | 9.8x | 284x | +32L |
1.6 | 510 L | - | 9.8x | 319x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 284x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 319x |
Difference with world average | +32L |