Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.2 24V | 1125 L | 129 L to 1 s | 15.8x | 271x | +647L |
Vehicle | 4.2 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1125 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 129 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +647L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V6 | 1055 L | 111 L to 1 s | 15.5x | 245x | +577L |
Vehicle | 4.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1055 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 111 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 15.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +577L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.3 V6 | 1000 L | - | 13.2x | 233x | +522L |
Vehicle | 4.3 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1000 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 233x |
Difference with world average | +522L |