Opel Crossland X Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Opel Crossland X trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 410 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.1 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.1 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 82 L
    • Max trunk load: 73 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.2 ECOTEC Turbo : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 3.4 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 1.2 Turbo : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 1.2 : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 ECOTEC : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 1.5d : 4 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.2 ECOTEC Turbo : 2.19 L/km-h (1.36 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 2.19 L/km-h (1.36 L/mph)
  • 1.2 Turbo : 2.07 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • 1.2 : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 1.6 ECOTEC : 2.28 L/km-h (1.42 L/mph)
  • 1.5d : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 ECOTEC Turbo : 77.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 : 102.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 : 80.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 ECOTEC : 124.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5d : 102.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.2 ECOTEC Turbo 410 L 37 L to 1 s 9.1x 342x -68L
    1.6 410 L 44 L to 1 s 9.1x 263x -68L
    1.2 Turbo 410 L 42 L to 1 s 9.1x 342x -68L
    1.2 410 L 30 L to 1 s 9.1x 342x -68L
    1.6 ECOTEC 410 L 36 L to 1 s 9.1x 263x -68L
    1.5d 410 L 37 L to 1 s 9.1x 274x -68L
    Vehicle 1.2 ECOTEC Turbo
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 342x
    Difference with world average -68L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 263x
    Difference with world average -68L
    Vehicle 1.2 Turbo
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 342x
    Difference with world average -68L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 342x
    Difference with world average -68L
    Vehicle 1.6 ECOTEC
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 263x
    Difference with world average -68L
    Vehicle 1.5d
    Trunk space 410 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 274x
    Difference with world average -68L