Opel Rekord Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Opel Rekord trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 490 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.9 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.9 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 98 L
    • Max trunk load: 70 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.6 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 3.3 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.3 D : 7.5 L/hp (10.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 S : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 E : 4.5 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • 1.8 S : 5.4 L/hp (7.4 L/kW)
  • 2.2 D : 6.9 L/hp (9.4 L/kW)
  • 1.8i CAT : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 1.8 : 6.5 L/hp (8.9 L/kW)
  • 2.3 TD : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.3 D : 3.16 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 S : 2.71 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)
  • 2.0 E : 2.62 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)
  • 1.8 S : 2.83 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)
  • 2.2 D : 3.06 L/km-h (1.9 L/mph)
  • 1.8i CAT : 2.77 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)
  • 1.8 : 3.06 L/km-h (1.9 L/mph)
  • 2.3 TD : 2.92 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.3 D : 72.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 S : 57x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 E : 57x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 S : 60.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 D : 73.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8i CAT : 54.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 : 53.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 TD : 71x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.3 D 490 L 23 L to 1 s 7.5x 217x +12L
    2.0 S 490 L 41 L to 1 s 7.5x 248x +12L
    2.0 E 490 L 43 L to 1 s 7.5x 248x +12L
    1.8 S 490 L 37 L to 1 s 7.5x 273x +12L
    2.2 D 490 L 26 L to 1 s 7.5x 217x +12L
    1.8i CAT 490 L 40 L to 1 s 7.5x 273x +12L
    1.8 490 L 31 L to 1 s 7.5x 273x +12L
    2.3 TD 490 L 34 L to 1 s 7.5x 217x +12L
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 217x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 248x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 248x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 2.2 D
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 217x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 1.8i CAT
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 1.8
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +12L
    Vehicle 2.3 TD
    Trunk space 490 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 217x
    Difference with world average +12L

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 881 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 19.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 8.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 176.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 69 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 8.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 5.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 S : 8.8 L/hp (11.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 S : 5.03 L/km-h (3.13 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 S : 96.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 S 881 L 69 L to 1 s 12.6x 445x +403L
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 445x
    Difference with world average +403L

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 108 L
      • Max trunk load: 68 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 6.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 E : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 S : 5.3 L/hp (7.3 L/kW)
  • 2.1 D : 9 L/hp (12.3 L/kW)
  • 1.9 : 7.2 L/hp (9.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 6 L/hp (8.2 L/kW)
  • 1.7 : 9 L/hp (12.3 L/kW)
  • 2.3 D : 8.3 L/hp (11.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 E : 2.98 L/km-h (1.85 L/mph)
  • 2.0 S : 3.12 L/km-h (1.94 L/mph)
  • 2.1 D : 3.91 L/km-h (2.43 L/mph)
  • 1.9 : 3.48 L/km-h (2.16 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 3.27 L/km-h (2.03 L/mph)
  • 1.7 : 3.7 L/km-h (2.3 L/mph)
  • 2.3 D : 3.86 L/km-h (2.4 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 E : 56.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 S : 58.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 D : 68.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 : 54.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 51.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 : 54.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 D : 65.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 E 540 L 47 L to 1 s 8.3x 273x +62L
    2.0 S 540 L 45 L to 1 s 8.3x 273x +62L
    2.1 D 540 L 24 L to 1 s 8.3x 261x +62L
    1.9 540 L 36 L to 1 s 8.3x 285x +62L
    2.0 540 L 41 L to 1 s 8.3x 273x +62L
    1.7 540 L 28 L to 1 s 7.7x 318x +62L
    2.3 D 540 L 26 L to 1 s 8.3x 239x +62L
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 261x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.9
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 285x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.7
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 318x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 239x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 881 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 19.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 8.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 176.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 71 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 11 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 6.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 S : 8.7 L/hp (11.9 L/kW)
  • 2.1 D : 14.7 L/hp (20 L/kW)
  • 1.9 : 11.7 L/hp (16 L/kW)
  • 2.0 E : 8 L/hp (10.9 L/kW)
  • 2.3 D : 13.6 L/hp (18.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 9.8 L/hp (13.3 L/kW)
  • 1.7 : 14.7 L/hp (20 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 S : 5.18 L/km-h (3.22 L/mph)
  • 2.1 D : 6.53 L/km-h (4.06 L/mph)
  • 1.9 : 5.8 L/km-h (3.6 L/mph)
  • 2.0 E : 5.01 L/km-h (3.11 L/mph)
  • 2.3 D : 6.29 L/km-h (3.91 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 5.44 L/km-h (3.38 L/mph)
  • 1.7 : 6.16 L/km-h (3.83 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 S : 94.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 D : 108.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 : 89x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 E : 94.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 D : 103.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 84.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 : 82.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 S 881 L 69 L to 1 s 12.6x 445x +403L
    2.1 D 881 L - 12.6x 426x +403L
    1.9 881 L 50 L to 1 s 12.6x 464x +403L
    2.0 E 881 L 71 L to 1 s 12.6x 445x +403L
    2.3 D 881 L 37 L to 1 s 12.6x 390x +403L
    2.0 881 L 62 L to 1 s 12.6x 445x +403L
    1.7 881 L 43 L to 1 s 12.6x 519x +403L
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 445x
    Difference with world average +403L
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 426x
    Difference with world average +403L
    Vehicle 1.9
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 464x
    Difference with world average +403L
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 71 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 445x
    Difference with world average +403L
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 390x
    Difference with world average +403L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 445x
    Difference with world average +403L
    Vehicle 1.7
    Trunk space 881 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 519x
    Difference with world average +403L

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 408 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 81.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 67 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.7 : 6.2 L/hp (8.3 L/kW)
  • 1.9 : 4.5 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 1.7 S : 4.9 L/hp (6.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 4.1 L/hp (5.5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 S : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 D : 7.4 L/hp (10.2 L/kW)
  • 2.1 D : 6.8 L/hp (9.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.7 : 2.85 L/km-h (1.77 L/mph)
  • 1.9 : 2.55 L/km-h (1.58 L/mph)
  • 1.7 S : 2.63 L/km-h (1.63 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • 1.9 S : 2.53 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 2.0 D : 3.14 L/km-h (1.95 L/mph)
  • 2.1 D : 3.02 L/km-h (1.88 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.7 : 39.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 : 35.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 S : 38.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 35.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 S : 35.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 D : 51.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 D : 51x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.7 408 L 21 L to 1 s 5.8x 240x -70L
    1.9 408 L 31 L to 1 s 5.8x 215x -70L
    1.7 S 408 L 26 L to 1 s 5.8x 240x -70L
    2.0 408 L 33 L to 1 s 5.8x 206x -70L
    1.9 S 408 L 31 L to 1 s 5.8x 215x -70L
    2.0 D 408 L - 5.8x 204x -70L
    2.1 D 408 L 18 L to 1 s 5.8x 197x -70L
    Vehicle 1.7
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.9
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 215x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.7 S
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 206x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 215x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -70L
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Trunk space 408 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 197x
    Difference with world average -70L

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 431 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 86.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 67 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.7 S : 5.2 L/hp (7.1 L/kW)
  • 1.9 : 4.8 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 1.9 S : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.7 S : 2.81 L/km-h (1.75 L/mph)
  • 1.9 : 2.65 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 1.9 S : 2.7 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.7 S : 34.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 : 37.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 48.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 S : 37.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.7 S 435 L 28 L to 1 s 6.2x 256x -43L
    1.9 435 L 33 L to 1 s 6.2x 229x -43L
    2.0 420 L 41 L to 1 s 6.5x 212x -58L
    1.9 S 435 L 33 L to 1 s 6.2x 229x -43L
    Vehicle 1.7 S
    Trunk space 435 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 256x
    Difference with world average -43L
    Vehicle 1.9
    Trunk space 435 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 229x
    Difference with world average -43L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 212x
    Difference with world average -58L
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Trunk space 435 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 229x
    Difference with world average -43L