cat_logo
HomeOpel

Senator

Opel Senator Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Opel Senator trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 530 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 106 L
    • Max trunk load: 85 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.4 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.3 TD Interc.: 5.3 L/hp (7.2 L/kW)
  • 3.0i V6 24V : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 2.3 TD Inerc. : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 3.0i V6 : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 3.0i V6 CAT : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 2.3 TD : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 2.6i : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.5i : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.3 TD Interc.: 2.88 L/km-h (1.79 L/mph)
  • 3.0i V6 24V : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • 2.3 TD Inerc. : 3.01 L/km-h (1.87 L/mph)
  • 3.0i V6 : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 3.0i V6 CAT : 2.49 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 2.3 TD : 3.01 L/km-h (1.87 L/mph)
  • 2.6i : 2.49 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 2.5i : 2.52 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.3 TD Interc.: 66.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0i V6 24V : 57.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 TD Inerc. : 64.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0i V6 : 52x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0i V6 CAT : 55.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 TD : 66.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.6i : 56.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5i : 40.8x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.3 TD Interc. 530 L 40 L to 1 s 7.1x 235x +52L
    3.0i V6 24V 530 L 72 L to 1 s 7.1x 179x +52L
    2.3 TD Inerc. 530 L 38 L to 1 s 7.1x 235x +52L
    3.0i V6 530 L 62 L to 1 s 7.1x 179x +52L
    3.0i V6 CAT 530 L 62 L to 1 s 7.1x 179x +52L
    2.3 TD 530 L 38 L to 1 s 7.1x 235x +52L
    2.6i 530 L 54 L to 1 s 7.1x 204x +52L
    2.5i 530 L 47 L to 1 s 7.1x 213x +52L
    Vehicle 2.3 TD Interc.
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 3.0i V6 24V
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 2.3 TD Inerc.
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 3.0i V6
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 3.0i V6 CAT
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 2.3 TD
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 235x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 2.6i
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 2.5i
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average +52L