cat_logo
HomeOpel

Zafira

Opel Zafira Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Opel Zafira trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 264 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.9 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 2.6 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 37.7 L
    • Max trunk load: 99 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 1.4 LPG : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 CDTI : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 CNG : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • 1.4 ecoFLEX : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 CDTI : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 DI Turbo : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 Turbo : 5.2 L/hp (7.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0d : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 : 0.77 L/km-h (0.48 L/mph)
  • 1.4 LPG : 0.78 L/km-h (0.48 L/mph)
  • 2.0 CDTI : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 0.73 L/km-h (0.45 L/mph)
  • 1.6 CNG : 0.76 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 1.4 ecoFLEX : 0.75 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 1.6 CDTI : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 1.6 DI Turbo : 0.72 L/km-h (0.45 L/mph)
  • 1.6 Turbo : 3.64 L/km-h (2.26 L/mph)
  • 2.0d : 3.36 L/km-h (2.09 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.4 : 23.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 LPG : 22x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 CDTI : 26.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 : 19.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 CNG : 20x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 ecoFLEX : 24.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 CDTI : 33.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 DI Turbo : 21.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 Turbo : 101.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0d : 129.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 152 L 15 L to 1 s 2.6x 111x -326L
    1.4 LPG 152 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 111x -326L
    2.0 CDTI 152 L 13 L to 1 s 2.6x 78x -326L
    1.6 152 L 17 L to 1 s 2.6x 95x -326L
    1.6 CNG 152 L 14 L to 1 s 14.5x 95x -326L
    1.4 ecoFLEX 152 L 15 L to 1 s 2.6x 111x -326L
    1.6 CDTI 152 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 95x -326L
    1.6 DI Turbo 152 L 16 L to 1 s 2.6x 95x -326L
    1.6 Turbo 710 L 66 L to 1 s 12.2x 444x +232L
    2.0d 710 L 76 L to 1 s 12.2x 363x +232L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 111x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.4 LPG
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 111x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTI
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 13 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 78x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 17 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 95x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 CNG
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 14.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 95x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.4 ecoFLEX
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 111x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 CDTI
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 95x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 DI Turbo
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 95x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 Turbo
    Trunk space 710 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 66 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 444x
    Difference with world average +232L
    Vehicle 2.0d
    Trunk space 710 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 363x
    Difference with world average +232L

    Quick notes on Opel Zafira trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 319 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 53.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 97 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 CDTI : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 CDTI ecoFLEX : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX : 0.9 L/hp (1.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 Turbo : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 Turbo : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 0.8 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 CDTI : 5.2 L/hp (7.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 Turbo Ecotec : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8 : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 CDTI : 0.7 L/km-h (0.43 L/mph)
  • 2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX : 0.73 L/km-h (0.45 L/mph)
  • 1.4 Turbo : 0.75 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 1.6 Turbo : 3.46 L/km-h (2.15 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 0.69 L/km-h (0.43 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 0.79 L/km-h (0.49 L/mph)
  • 1.6 CDTI : 3.82 L/km-h (2.37 L/mph)
  • 1.6 Turbo Ecotec : 3.41 L/km-h (2.12 L/mph)
  • 1.8 : 0.78 L/km-h (0.48 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 CDTI : 27.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 CDTI ecoFLEX : 32.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX : 29.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 Turbo : 24.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 Turbo : 122.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 : 22.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 24.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 CDTI : 157.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 Turbo Ecotec : 98.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 : 21.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 CDTI 152 L 18 L to 1 s 2.6x 78x -326L
    1.6 CDTI ecoFLEX 152 L - 2.6x 95x -326L
    2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX 152 L 16 L to 1 s 2.6x 78x -326L
    1.4 Turbo 152 L 15 L to 1 s 2.6x 112x -326L
    1.6 Turbo 710 L 76 L to 1 s 12.2x 444x +232L
    1.6 152 L 18 L to 1 s 2.6x 95x -326L
    1.4 152 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 111x -326L
    1.6 CDTI 710 L 59 L to 1 s 12.2x 444x +232L
    1.6 Turbo Ecotec 710 L 82 L to 1 s 12.2x 444x +232L
    1.8 152 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 85x -326L
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTI
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 78x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 CDTI ecoFLEX
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 95x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTI ecoFLEX
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 78x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.4 Turbo
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 112x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 Turbo
    Trunk space 710 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 444x
    Difference with world average +232L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 95x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 111x
    Difference with world average -326L
    Vehicle 1.6 CDTI
    Trunk space 710 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 444x
    Difference with world average +232L
    Vehicle 1.6 Turbo Ecotec
    Trunk space 710 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 12.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 444x
    Difference with world average +232L
    Vehicle 1.8
    Trunk space 152 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 85x
    Difference with world average -326L

    Quick notes on Opel Zafira trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 540 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 12 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 108 L
      • Max trunk load: 92 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 XER : 3.9 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 2.2i 16V : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 1.9 CDTI : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 1.7 DTR : 4.3 L/hp (5.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6i 16V CNG : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 XER : 4.7 L/hp (6.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 CNG Turbo : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 XER : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 2.2i 16V : 2.7 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)
  • 1.9 CDTI : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo : 2.4 L/km-h (1.49 L/mph)
  • OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo : 2.34 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • 1.7 DTR : 2.86 L/km-h (1.78 L/mph)
  • 1.6i 16V CNG : 3.27 L/km-h (2.03 L/mph)
  • 1.6 XER : 2.92 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 1.6 CNG Turbo : 2.7 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 XER : 73x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2i 16V : 65.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 CDTI : 88.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo : 56.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo : 56.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 DTR : 94.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6i 16V CNG : 103.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 XER : 76.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 CNG Turbo : 70.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 XER 540 L 50 L to 1 s 9.3x 301x +62L
    2.2i 16V 540 L 53 L to 1 s 9.3x 246x +62L
    1.9 CDTI 540 L 55 L to 1 s 9.3x 283x +62L
    2.0i 16V Turbo 540 L 63 L to 1 s 9.3x 270x +62L
    OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo 540 L 73 L to 1 s 9.3x 270x +62L
    1.7 DTR 540 L 46 L to 1 s 9.3x 320x +62L
    1.6i 16V CNG 540 L 33 L to 1 s - 338x +62L
    1.6 XER 540 L 43 L to 1 s 9.3x 338x +62L
    1.6 CNG Turbo 540 L 50 L to 1 s 9.3x 338x +62L
    Vehicle 1.8 XER
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 301x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 246x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.9 CDTI
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 283x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.7 DTR
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 320x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V CNG
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 338x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.6 XER
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 338x
    Difference with world average +62L
    Vehicle 1.6 CNG Turbo
    Trunk space 540 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 338x
    Difference with world average +62L

    Quick notes on Opel Zafira trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 140 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 3.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 1.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 20 L
      • Max trunk load: 93 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 0.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6i 16V CNG : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 1.9 CDTI : 0.9 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)
  • 1.7 CDTI : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6i 16V : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo : 0.7 L/hp (1 L/kW)
  • OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo : 0.6 L/hp (0.8 L/kW)
  • 2.2i 16V : 0.9 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6i 16V CNG : 0.85 L/km-h (0.53 L/mph)
  • 1.9 CDTI : 0.69 L/km-h (0.43 L/mph)
  • 1.7 CDTI : 0.74 L/km-h (0.46 L/mph)
  • 1.6i 16V : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 1.8i 16V : 0.71 L/km-h (0.44 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo : 0.62 L/km-h (0.39 L/mph)
  • OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo : 0.61 L/km-h (0.38 L/mph)
  • 2.2i 16V : 0.74 L/km-h (0.46 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6i 16V CNG : 26.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 CDTI : 22.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 CDTI : 24.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6i 16V : 19.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8i 16V : 19.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo : 14.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo : 14.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2i 16V : 16.3x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6i 16V CNG 140 L 9 L to 1 s - 88x -338L
    1.9 CDTI 140 L 14 L to 1 s 2.5x 73x -338L
    1.7 CDTI 140 L 12 L to 1 s 2.4x 83x -338L
    1.6i 16V 140 L 10 L to 1 s 2.4x 88x -338L
    1.8i 16V 140 L 11 L to 1 s 2.4x 78x -338L
    2.0i 16V Turbo 140 L 16 L to 1 s 2.4x 70x -338L
    OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo 140 L 19 L to 1 s 2.4x 70x -338L
    2.2i 16V 140 L 13 L to 1 s 2.4x 64x -338L
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V CNG
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 9 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 88x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle 1.9 CDTI
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 73x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle 1.7 CDTI
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 12 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 83x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 88x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 78x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 70x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 70x
    Difference with world average -338L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V
    Trunk space 140 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 13 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 64x
    Difference with world average -338L

    Quick notes on Opel Zafira trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 149 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 3.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 1.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 21.3 L
      • Max trunk load: 87 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 CNG : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 1.8 16V : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 16V : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)
  • 2.2 16V : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • 2.2 DTI : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V DTI : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 CNG : 0.88 L/km-h (0.55 L/mph)
  • 1.8 16V : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 1.6 16V : 0.81 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 2.2 16V : 0.75 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 2.2 DTI : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V DTI : 0.86 L/km-h (0.53 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 CNG : 28.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 16V : 17.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 16V : 16.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 DTI : 23.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V DTI : 22.7x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 CNG 150 L 10 L to 1 s - 94x -328L
    1.8 16V 150 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 84x -328L
    1.6 16V 142 L 11 L to 1 s 2.4x 89x -336L
    2.2 16V 150 L 16 L to 1 s 2.6x 68x -328L
    2.2 DTI 150 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 69x -328L
    2.0 16V DTI 150 L 11 L to 1 s 2.6x 75x -328L
    Vehicle 1.6 CNG
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 84x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 142 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 89x
    Difference with world average -336L
    Vehicle 2.2 16V
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 68x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 2.2 DTI
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 69x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V DTI
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 75x
    Difference with world average -328L

    Quick notes on Opel Zafira trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 147 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 3.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 1.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 21 L
      • Max trunk load: 87 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 2 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 16V : 1.2 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V DTI : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.2 16V : 1 L/hp (1.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 16V : 1.4 L/hp (1.9 L/kW)
  • 1.6 CNG : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • OPC 2.0 16V : 0.8 L/hp (1.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 DI 16V : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 2.2 DTI : 1.2 L/hp (1.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 16V : 0.77 L/km-h (0.48 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V DTI : 0.86 L/km-h (0.53 L/mph)
  • 2.2 16V : 0.75 L/km-h (0.47 L/mph)
  • 1.6 16V : 0.81 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)
  • 1.6 CNG : 0.88 L/km-h (0.55 L/mph)
  • OPC 2.0 16V : 0.68 L/km-h (0.42 L/mph)
  • 2.0 DI 16V : 0.89 L/km-h (0.55 L/mph)
  • 2.2 DTI : 0.8 L/km-h (0.5 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 16V : 16.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V DTI : 22.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 16V : 16.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 CNG : 28.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • OPC 2.0 16V : 14.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 DI 16V : 21.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 DTI : 22.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 16V 142 L 12 L to 1 s 2.4x 79x -336L
    2.0 16V DTI 150 L 11 L to 1 s 2.6x 75x -328L
    2.2 16V 150 L 16 L to 1 s 2.6x 68x -328L
    1.6 16V 142 L 11 L to 1 s 2.4x 89x -336L
    1.6 CNG 150 L 10 L to 1 s - 94x -328L
    OPC 2.0 16V 150 L 19 L to 1 s 2.6x 75x -328L
    2.0 DI 16V 142 L 9 L to 1 s 2.4x 71x -336L
    2.2 DTI 150 L 14 L to 1 s 2.6x 69x -328L
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Trunk space 142 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 12 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 79x
    Difference with world average -336L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V DTI
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 75x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 2.2 16V
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 68x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 142 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 11 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 89x
    Difference with world average -336L
    Vehicle 1.6 CNG
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 10 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 94x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle OPC 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 75x
    Difference with world average -328L
    Vehicle 2.0 DI 16V
    Trunk space 142 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 9 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 71x
    Difference with world average -336L
    Vehicle 2.2 DTI
    Trunk space 150 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 2.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 69x
    Difference with world average -328L