Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 BlueHDi | 520 L | 47 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 333x | +42L |
2.0 BlueHDi | 520 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 260x | +42L |
GT 2.0 BlueHDi | 520 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 260x | +42L |
1.2 PureTech | 520 L | 52 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 434x | +42L |
1.6 THP | 520 L | 61 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 325x | +42L |
1.5 BlueHDi | 520 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 347x | +42L |
1.6 PureTech | 520 L | 68 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 325x | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 BlueHDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 333x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.2 PureTech |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 434x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 325x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.5 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 347x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 PureTech |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 325x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 BlueHDi | 432 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 277x | -46L |
1.2 PureTech | 432 L | 42 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 360x | -46L |
2.0 BlueHDi | 432 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 216x | -46L |
2.0 HDi | 432 L | 45 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 216x | -46L |
1.6 THP | 432 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 270x | -46L |
1.6 BlueHDI | 432 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 277x | -46L |
1.6 Vti | 432 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 270x | -46L |
1.6 HDi | 432 L | 36 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 277x | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.6 BlueHDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.2 PureTech |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 360x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.6 BlueHDI |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.6 Vti |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 VTI | 432 L | - | 7.2x | 270x | -46L |
2.0 HDi FAP | 432 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 216x | -46L |
1.6 HDi | 512 L | 43 L to 1 s | 8.5x | 328x | +34L |
1.6 THP | 432 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 270x | -46L |
2.0 HDi | 377 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 189x | -101L |
Vehicle | 1.6 VTI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi FAP |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Trunk space | 512 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 328x |
Difference with world average | +34L |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
Trunk space | 432 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | -46L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 377 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 189x |
Difference with world average | -101L |