Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 440 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 277x | -38L |
1.4i | 440 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 323x | -38L |
1.8i | 440 L | 30 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 250x | -38L |
1.9d | 440 L | 24 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 231x | -38L |
1.9 TDi | 440 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 231x | -38L |
2.0i | 442 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 221x | -36L |
2.0 HDi | 442 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 221x | -36L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 277x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 323x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 250x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.9d |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDi |
Trunk space | 440 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | -38L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 442 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -36L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i | 463 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 340x | -15L |
1.6i | 463 L | 46 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 292x | -15L |
1.8i 16V | 463 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 263x | -15L |
1.9d | 463 L | 28 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 248x | -15L |
2.0i 16V | 463 L | 42 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 232x | -15L |
2.0 HDI | 463 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 232x | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.9d |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 248x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 338 L | 34 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 213x | -140L |
1.4i | 338 L | 27 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 248x | -140L |
2.0i 16V | 338 L | 34 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 169x | -140L |
2.0 S16 | 338 L | 40 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 169x | -140L |
1.8 | 340 L | 32 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 193x | -138L |
1.9 D | 338 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 181x | -140L |
2.0 HDi | 340 L | 32 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 170x | -138L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 248x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 2.0 S16 |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 340 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -138L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 274 L | - | 4.6x | 173x | -204L |
2.0i 16V | 274 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 137x | -204L |
1.8i | 274 L | 18 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 156x | -204L |
1.8i 16V | 274 L | 23 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 156x | -204L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 137x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 ST | 463 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 263x | -15L |
1.4 SL | 463 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 340x | -15L |
1.6 SR | 463 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 292x | -15L |
1.9 SRDT | 463 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 243x | -15L |
1.9 SLD | 463 L | 28 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 243x | -15L |
2.0 ST | 463 L | 44 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 232x | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.8 ST |
---|---|
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.4 SL |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.6 SR |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.9 SRDT |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 243x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 1.9 SLD |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 243x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | 2.0 ST |
Trunk space | 463 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -15L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 274 L | 23 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 156x | -204L |
1.6 | 274 L | 23 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 173x | -204L |
2.0 | 274 L | 27 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 137x | -204L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 274 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 137x |
Difference with world average | -204L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 | 338 L | 29 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 192x | -140L |
1.1 | 338 L | 19 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 301x | -140L |
1.6 | 338 L | 27 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 213x | -140L |
1.4 | 338 L | 24 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 248x | -140L |
1.9 D | 338 L | 20 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 177x | -140L |
1.9 DT | 338 L | 29 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 177x | -140L |
2.0 S16 | 338 L | 42 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 169x | -140L |
2.0 XSi | 338 L | 34 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 169x | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 192x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.1 |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 301x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 213x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 248x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 1.9 DT |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 2.0 S16 |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -140L |
Vehicle | 2.0 XSi |
Trunk space | 338 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -140L |