Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 BlueHDi | 780 L | 74 L to 1 s | 13.9x | 520x | +302L |
2.0 BlueHDi | 780 L | 90 L to 1 s | 13.9x | 391x | +302L |
1.2 PureTech | 780 L | 80 L to 1 s | 13.9x | 651x | +302L |
1.6 PureTech | 780 L | 99 L to 1 s | 13.9x | 488x | +302L |
Vehicle | 1.5 BlueHDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 74 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 520x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 90 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 391x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 1.2 PureTech |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 651x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 1.6 PureTech |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 99 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 488x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 PureTech | 679 L | 66 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 566x | +201L |
1.6 BlueHDi | 679 L | 56 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 435x | +201L |
1.6 THP | 679 L | 73 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 425x | +201L |
2.0 BlueHDi | 679 L | 73 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 340x | +201L |
1.6 VTi | 679 L | 59 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 425x | +201L |
1.6 HDi | 679 L | 58 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 435x | +201L |
1.6 e-HDi | 679 L | 54 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 435x | +201L |
2.0 HDi | 679 L | 69 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 340x | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.2 PureTech |
---|---|
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 66 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 566x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 435x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 425x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 2.0 BlueHDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 VTi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 425x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 435x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 e-HDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 435x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 THP | 679 L | 73 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 425x | +201L |
1.6 VTi | 679 L | 58 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 425x | +201L |
1.6 HDi | 679 L | 55 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 435x | +201L |
1.6 e-HDi | 679 L | 49 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 435x | +201L |
2.0 HDi | 679 L | 72 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 340x | +201L |
2.0 HDI | 679 L | 69 L to 1 s | 11.3x | 340x | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 THP |
---|---|
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 73 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 425x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 VTi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 425x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 HDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 435x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 1.6 e-HDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 435x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDi |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | +201L |
Vehicle | 2.0 HDI |
Trunk space | 679 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | +201L |