Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2i | 375 L | - | 7.1x | 169x | -103L |
3.0i V6 | 375 L | - | 7.1x | 126x | -103L |
2.5 i | 375 L | - | 7.1x | 150x | -103L |
2.5 i Turbo | 375 L | - | 7.1x | 150x | -103L |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -103L |
Vehicle | 3.0i V6 |
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 126x |
Difference with world average | -103L |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -103L |
Vehicle | 2.5 i Turbo |
Trunk space | 375 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -103L |