Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V | 450 L | - | 6x | 185x | -28L |
3.0 V6 SE | 450 L | - | 6x | 151x | -28L |
3.3 i V6 | 450 L | - | 6x | 136x | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 185x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 SE |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 151x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 i V6 | 670 L | - | 8.9x | 225x | +192L |
3.3 i 4WD SE | 670 L | - | 9.9x | 203x | +192L |
3.3 i | 670 L | - | 8.9x | 203x | +192L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 670 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 225x |
Difference with world average | +192L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i 4WD SE |
Trunk space | 670 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | +192L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i |
Trunk space | 670 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 203x |
Difference with world average | +192L |