Pontiac Grand AM Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Pontiac Grand AM trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 429 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.5 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 85.8 L
    • Max trunk load: 84 kg
    • Interior transformation: none
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.2i 16V : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4i : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4 i 16V SE : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 3.3i V6 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 3.1i V6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 3.4 i V6 GT : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.2i 16V : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.4 : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.4i : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.4 i 16V SE : 2.71 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)
  • 3.3i V6 : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 3.1i V6 : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 3.4 i V6 GT : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2i 16V : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4i : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.3i V6 : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.1i V6 : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.2i 16V 415 L - 7.7x 189x -63L
    2.4 415 L - 7.7x 173x -63L
    2.4i 415 L - 7.7x 173x -63L
    2.4 i 16V SE 515 L 60 L to 1 s 9x 215x +37L
    3.3i V6 415 L - 7.7x 124x -63L
    3.1i V6 415 L - 7.7x 132x -63L
    3.4 i V6 GT 415 L - 7.3x 124x -63L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 2.4
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 173x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 2.4i
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 173x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 16V SE
    Trunk space 515 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 215x
    Difference with world average +37L
    Vehicle 3.3i V6
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 124x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 3.1i V6
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 132x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 3.4 i V6 GT
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 124x
    Difference with world average -63L

    Quick notes on Pontiac Grand AM trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 415 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 83 L
      • Max trunk load: 85 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.2i 16V : 2.9 L/hp (4 L/kW)
  • 2.4i : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.4 i 16V SE : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 3.3 i V6 : 2.6 L/hp (3.5 L/kW)
  • 3.4 i V6 GT : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 3.1 i V6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.2i 16V : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.4i : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.4 i 16V SE : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 3.4 i V6 GT : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2i 16V : 49.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.3 i V6 : 42.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.4 i V6 GT : 42.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.1 i V6 : 42.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.2i 16V 415 L - 7.7x 189x -63L
    2.4i 415 L - 7.3x 173x -63L
    2.4 i 16V SE 415 L - 7.3x 173x -63L
    3.3 i V6 415 L - 7.3x 124x -63L
    3.4 i V6 GT 415 L - 7.3x 124x -63L
    3.1 i V6 415 L - 7.3x 132x -63L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 189x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 2.4i
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 173x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 2.4 i 16V SE
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 173x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 3.3 i V6
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 124x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 3.4 i V6 GT
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 124x
    Difference with world average -63L
    Vehicle 3.1 i V6
    Trunk space 415 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 132x
    Difference with world average -63L