Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 500 L | - | 7.7x | 252x | +22L |
S 3.0 V6 | 500 L | 100 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 167x | +22L |
Turbo 2.9 V6 | 500 L | 116 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 173x | +22L |
GTS 2.9 V6 | 488 L | 108 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 169x | +10L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | S 3.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 100 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Turbo 2.9 V6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 116 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 173x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | GTS 2.9 V6 |
Trunk space | 488 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 108 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | +10L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S 3.0 diesel V6 | 500 L | 83 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 169x | +22L |
Turbo 3.6 V6 | 500 L | 109 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 139x | +22L |
S 3.0 V6 | 500 L | 98 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 167x | +22L |
GTS 3.0 V6 | 500 L | 102 L to 1 s | 7.4x | 167x | +22L |
2.0 | 500 L | 78 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 252x | +22L |
Turbo 3.6 V6 performance | 500 L | 119 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 139x | +22L |
Vehicle | S 3.0 diesel V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 83 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Turbo 3.6 V6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 109 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | S 3.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 98 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | GTS 3.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 78 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Turbo 3.6 V6 performance |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 119 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | +22L |