Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 450 L | 48 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 282x | -28L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 282x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 403 L | 43 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 252x | -75L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 403 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | -75L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 403 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 252x | -75L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 403 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | -75L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 450 L | 50 L to 1 s | 8.2x | 282x | -28L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 282x |
Difference with world average | -28L |