Renault 25 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Renault 25 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 440 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.4 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 88 L
    • Max trunk load: 75 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.5 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.3 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.2i : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 4.3 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 12V : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 2.1 D : 6.3 L/hp (8.6 L/kW)
  • 2.1 TD : 5.2 L/hp (7 L/kW)
  • 2.5 i V6 Turbo : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.85 i V6 : 2.8 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.2i : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 12V : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.1 D : 2.67 L/km-h (1.66 L/mph)
  • 2.1 TD : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • 2.5 i V6 Turbo : 1.89 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 2.85 i V6 : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2i : 54.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 54.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i : 59.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i 12V : 51.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 D : 62x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.1 TD : 63.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.5 i V6 Turbo : 45.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.85 i V6 : 47.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.2i 440 L 40 L to 1 s 6.1x 203x -38L
    2.0 440 L 40 L to 1 s 6.1x 221x -38L
    2.0 i 440 L 43 L to 1 s 6.1x 221x -38L
    2.0 i 12V 440 L 47 L to 1 s 6.1x 221x -38L
    2.1 D 440 L 27 L to 1 s 6.1x 213x -38L
    2.1 TD 440 L 35 L to 1 s 6.1x 213x -38L
    2.5 i V6 Turbo 440 L 63 L to 1 s 6.1x 179x -38L
    2.85 i V6 440 L 50 L to 1 s 6.1x 154x -38L
    Vehicle 2.2i
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 203x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 12V
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.1 TD
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.5 i V6 Turbo
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average -38L
    Vehicle 2.85 i V6
    Trunk space 440 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average -38L