Renault Kangoo Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 3000 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 66.7 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 30 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 1500 L
    • Max trunk load: 76 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 30.4 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 15 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 33.3 L/hp (45.5 L/kW)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 40 L/hp (54.5 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TCe : 26.1 L/hp (35.3 L/kW)
  • 1.2 Energy TCe : 26.1 L/hp (35.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 dCi : 18.75 L/km-h (11.65 L/mph)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 20 L/km-h (12.43 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TCe : 17.44 L/km-h (10.84 L/mph)
  • 1.2 Energy TCe : 17.34 L/km-h (10.77 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 588.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 697.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TCe : 468.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 Energy TCe : 483.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 dCi 3000 L 211 L to 1 s 50x 2053x +2522L
    1.5 Energy dCi 3000 L 194 L to 1 s 50x 2053x +2522L
    1.2 TCe 3000 L 303 L to 1 s 53.6x 2506x +2522L
    1.2 Energy TCe 3000 L 270 L to 1 s 53.6x 2506x +2522L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 3000 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 211 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 50x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 2053x
    Difference with world average +2522L
    Vehicle 1.5 Energy dCi
    Trunk space 3000 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 194 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 50x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 2053x
    Difference with world average +2522L
    Vehicle 1.2 TCe
    Trunk space 3000 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 303 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 53.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 2506x
    Difference with world average +2522L
    Vehicle 1.2 Energy TCe
    Trunk space 3000 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 270 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 53.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 2506x
    Difference with world average +2522L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 660 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 132 L
      • Max trunk load: 79 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 6.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.2 Energy TCe : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 8.8 L/hp (12 L/kW)
  • 1.6 16V : 6.2 L/hp (8.4 L/kW)
  • 1.5 dCi : 6 L/hp (8.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.2 Energy TCe : 3.82 L/km-h (2.37 L/mph)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 4.4 L/km-h (2.73 L/mph)
  • 1.6 16V : 4.26 L/km-h (2.65 L/mph)
  • 1.5 dCi : 3.88 L/km-h (2.41 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 Energy TCe : 108.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 153.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 16V : 80.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 dCi : 143.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.2 Energy TCe 660 L 59 L to 1 s 11.8x 551x +182L
    1.5 Energy dCi 660 L 43 L to 1 s 11x 452x +182L
    1.6 16V 660 L 51 L to 1 s 11.8x 413x +182L
    1.5 dCi 660 L 56 L to 1 s 11x 452x +182L
    Vehicle 1.2 Energy TCe
    Trunk space 660 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 551x
    Difference with world average +182L
    Vehicle 1.5 Energy dCi
    Trunk space 660 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 452x
    Difference with world average +182L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 660 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 413x
    Difference with world average +182L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 660 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 11x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 452x
    Difference with world average +182L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 42.9 L
      • Max trunk load: 86 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 dCi : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 63.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 66.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 dCi 300 L 26 L to 1 s 5x 205x -178L
    1.5 Energy dCi 300 L 26 L to 1 s 5x 205x -178L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 205x
    Difference with world average -178L
    Vehicle 1.5 Energy dCi
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 205x
    Difference with world average -178L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 4000 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 88.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 40 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 2000 L
      • Max trunk load: 80 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 40 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 16.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 36.4 L/hp (49.4 L/kW)
  • 1.5 dCi : 44.4 L/hp (60.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 23.53 L/km-h (14.62 L/mph)
  • 1.5 dCi : 25 L/km-h (15.53 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 888.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 dCi : 769.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 Energy dCi 4000 L 342 L to 1 s 66.7x 2738x +3522L
    1.5 dCi 4000 L 282 L to 1 s 66.7x 2738x +3522L
    Vehicle 1.5 Energy dCi
    Trunk space 4000 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 342 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 66.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 2738x
    Difference with world average +3522L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 4000 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 282 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 66.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 2738x
    Difference with world average +3522L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 2300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 51.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 23 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 1150 L
      • Max trunk load: 76 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 25.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 10.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 25.6 L/hp (34.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 14.38 L/km-h (8.94 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 Energy dCi : 534.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 Energy dCi 2300 L 183 L to 1 s 38.3x 1574x +1822L
    Vehicle 1.5 Energy dCi
    Trunk space 2300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 183 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 38.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 1574x
    Difference with world average +1822L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 300 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 42.9 L
      • Max trunk load: 86 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 dCi : 1.88 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 54.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 dCi 300 L 21 L to 1 s 5x 205x -178L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 300 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 205x
    Difference with world average -178L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 214 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.1 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 53.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 88 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 16V : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 1.5 dCi : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 16V : 1.26 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • 1.5 dCi : 1.27 L/km-h (0.79 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 16V : 27.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 dCi : 37.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 16V 214 L 19 L to 1 s 3.6x 134x -264L
    1.5 dCi 214 L 18 L to 1 s 3.6x 146x -264L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 214 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 134x
    Difference with world average -264L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 214 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 146x
    Difference with world average -264L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 438 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 87.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 84 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 5.8 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 16V : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 8V : 5 L/hp (6.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.5 dCi : 2.9 L/km-h (1.8 L/mph)
  • 1.6 16V : 2.58 L/km-h (1.6 L/mph)
  • 1.6 8V : 2.77 L/km-h (1.72 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.5 dCi : 84.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 16V : 56.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 8V : 54.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.5 dCi 438 L 26 L to 1 s 7.3x 300x -40L
    1.6 16V 438 L 35 L to 1 s 7.3x 274x -40L
    1.6 8V 438 L 29 L to 1 s 7.3x 274x -40L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 438 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average -40L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 438 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 274x
    Difference with world average -40L
    Vehicle 1.6 8V
    Trunk space 438 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 274x
    Difference with world average -40L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 640 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 128 L
      • Max trunk load: 67 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 8.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.2 16V : 8.7 L/hp (11.8 L/kW)
  • 1.2 : 11.2 L/hp (15.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 16V : 6.8 L/hp (9.3 L/kW)
  • 1.0 : 11 L/hp (15.1 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 8.7 L/hp (11.8 L/kW)
  • 1.0 16V : 9.6 L/hp (13 L/kW)
  • 1.5 dCi : 7.9 L/hp (10.8 L/kW)
  • 1.9 dCi : 6.5 L/hp (8.9 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 10 L/hp (13.5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 dTi : 8.1 L/hp (11 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.2 16V : 4.22 L/km-h (2.62 L/mph)
  • 1.2 : 4.78 L/km-h (2.97 L/mph)
  • 1.6 16V : 4.01 L/km-h (2.49 L/mph)
  • 1.0 : 4.81 L/km-h (2.99 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 4.42 L/km-h (2.75 L/mph)
  • 1.0 16V : 4.51 L/km-h (2.8 L/mph)
  • 1.5 dCi : 4.19 L/km-h (2.6 L/mph)
  • 1.9 dCi : 3.77 L/km-h (2.34 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 4.64 L/km-h (2.88 L/mph)
  • 1.9 dTi : 4.06 L/km-h (2.52 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 16V : 92.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 : 94.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 16V : 81.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 82.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 dCi : 122.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 dCi : 74.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 D : 89x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 dTi : 114x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.2 16V 650 L 48 L to 1 s 13x 566x +172L
    1.2 650 L 36 L to 1 s 13x 566x +172L
    1.6 16V 650 L 55 L to 1 s 13x 407x +172L
    1.0 650 L 32 L to 1 s 13x 651x +172L
    1.4 650 L 40 L to 1 s 13x 468x +172L
    1.0 16V 650 L 37 L to 1 s 13x 651x +172L
    1.5 dCi 650 L 55 L to 1 s 13x 445x +172L
    1.9 dCi 550 L 36 L to 1 s 9.2x 294x +72L
    1.9 D 650 L 32 L to 1 s 13x 348x +172L
    1.9 dTi 650 L 49 L to 1 s 13x 348x +172L
    Vehicle 1.2 16V
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 566x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 566x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 407x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.0
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 651x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 468x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.0 16V
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 651x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 445x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.9 dCi
    Trunk space 550 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 36 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 294x
    Difference with world average +72L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.9 dTi
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +172L

    Quick notes on Renault Kangoo trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 650 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 14.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 130 L
      • Max trunk load: 72 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 8.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 4.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6i 16V : 6.8 L/hp (9.3 L/kW)
  • 1.4i : 8.7 L/hp (11.8 L/kW)
  • 1.2 : 11.2 L/hp (15.1 L/kW)
  • 1.2i 16V : 8.7 L/hp (11.8 L/kW)
  • 1.5 dCi : 7.9 L/hp (10.8 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 10 L/hp (13.5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 dTi : 8.1 L/hp (11 L/kW)
  • 1.9 dCi : 8.1 L/hp (11 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6i 16V : 4.25 L/km-h (2.64 L/mph)
  • 1.4i : 4.25 L/km-h (2.64 L/mph)
  • 1.2 : 4.64 L/km-h (2.88 L/mph)
  • 1.2i 16V : 4.22 L/km-h (2.62 L/mph)
  • 1.5 dCi : 4.19 L/km-h (2.6 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 4.48 L/km-h (2.78 L/mph)
  • 1.9 dTi : 4.06 L/km-h (2.52 L/mph)
  • 1.9 dCi : 4.58 L/km-h (2.85 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6i 16V : 75.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4i : 86.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 : 94.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2i 16V : 92.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 dCi : 122.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 D : 95.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 dTi : 114x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 dCi : 87.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6i 16V 650 L 52 L to 1 s 10.8x 407x +172L
    1.4i 650 L 46 L to 1 s 13x 468x +172L
    1.2 650 L 40 L to 1 s 13x 566x +172L
    1.2i 16V 650 L 46 L to 1 s 13x 566x +172L
    1.5 dCi 650 L 55 L to 1 s 13x 445x +172L
    1.9 D 650 L 35 L to 1 s 13x 348x +172L
    1.9 dTi 650 L 49 L to 1 s 13x 348x +172L
    1.9 dCi 650 L 42 L to 1 s 10.8x 348x +172L
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 407x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.4i
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 468x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 566x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.2i 16V
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 566x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.5 dCi
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 445x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.9 dTi
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 13x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +172L
    Vehicle 1.9 dCi
    Trunk space 650 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 348x
    Difference with world average +172L