Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 Blue dCi | 498 L | 44 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 285x | +20L |
2.0 Blue dCi | 498 L | 52 L to 1 s | 8.3x | 250x | +20L |
Vehicle | 1.7 Blue dCi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 498 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 285x |
Difference with world average | +20L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Blue dCi |
Trunk space | 498 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 250x |
Difference with world average | +20L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi | 530 L | 59 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 266x | +52L |
1.6 dCi | 530 L | 42 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 332x | +52L |
2.0 | 538 L | 50 L to 1 s | 9x | 269x | +60L |
2.5 | 538 L | 58 L to 1 s | 9x | 216x | +60L |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 266x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
Trunk space | 530 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 332x |
Difference with world average | +52L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 538 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | +60L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Trunk space | 538 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 216x |
Difference with world average | +60L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi | 450 L | 48 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 226x | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi | 450 L | 48 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 226x | -28L |
2.0 dCi FAP | 450 L | 38 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 226x | -28L |
2.5 16V | 450 L | 51 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 181x | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi FAP |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 226x |
Difference with world average | -28L |
Vehicle | 2.5 16V |
Trunk space | 450 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -28L |