Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 V12 | 548 L | 110 L to 1 s | - | 81x | +70L |
Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 548 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 110 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 81x |
Difference with world average | +70L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 V12 | 395 L | 72 L to 1 s | 4x | 59x | -83L |
Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 V12 | 460 L | 82 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 68x | -18L |
Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 68x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 V12 | 460 L | 79 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 68x | -18L |
Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 79 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 68x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.7 V12 | 395 L | 72 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 59x | -83L |
Vehicle | 6.7 V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 i V12 | 395 L | 72 L to 1 s | 4x | 59x | -83L |
Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 59x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 i V12 | 315 L | 56 L to 1 s | 3.9x | 47x | -163L |
Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 315 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 47x |
Difference with world average | -163L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 i V12 48V | 460 L | 82 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 68x | -18L |
Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 48V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 68x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.75 i V12 48V | 460 L | 82 L to 1 s | 4.6x | 68x | -18L |
Vehicle | 6.75 i V12 48V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 82 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 68x |
Difference with world average | -18L |