Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 i 16V | 304 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 218x | -174L |
1.1 i 16V | 304 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 272x | -174L |
1.6 i 16V | 304 L | 34 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 191x | -174L |
1.8 i 16V | 304 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 169x | -174L |
2.0 TD | 304 L | 35 L to 1 s | 6.1x | 152x | -174L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 304 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -174L |
Vehicle | 1.1 i 16V |
Trunk space | 304 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 272x |
Difference with world average | -174L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Trunk space | 304 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -174L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 304 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -174L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Trunk space | 304 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -174L |