Rover Montego Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Rover Montego trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 520 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.6 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.2 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 104 L
    • Max trunk load: 66 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 5.7 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 3.6 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.3 : 7.5 L/hp (10.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 6 L/hp (8.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 : 5 L/hp (6.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TD : 6.4 L/hp (8.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.3 : 3.38 L/km-h (2.1 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 3.15 L/km-h (1.96 L/mph)
  • 2.0 : 2.97 L/km-h (1.85 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i : 2.81 L/km-h (1.75 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TD : 3.19 L/km-h (1.98 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.3 : 76.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 : 76.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 : 68.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i : 64.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 TD : 94.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.3 520 L 42 L to 1 s 10.4x 408x +42L
    1.6 520 L 49 L to 1 s 10.4x 325x +42L
    2.0 520 L 56 L to 1 s 10.4x 260x +42L
    2.0 i 520 L 60 L to 1 s 10.4x 261x +42L
    2.0 TD 520 L 43 L to 1 s 10.4x 261x +42L
    Vehicle 1.3
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 408x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 325x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.0
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 260x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 261x
    Difference with world average +42L
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Trunk space 520 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 10.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 261x
    Difference with world average +42L