Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 | 520 L | 42 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 408x | +42L |
1.6 | 520 L | 49 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 325x | +42L |
2.0 | 520 L | 56 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 260x | +42L |
2.0 i | 520 L | 60 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 261x | +42L |
2.0 TD | 520 L | 43 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 261x | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 408x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 325x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 260x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | +42L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Trunk space | 520 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | +42L |