Saab 9-3 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 425 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.4 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 85 L
    • Max trunk load: 89 kg
    • Interior transformation: limited
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 t Biopower : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TTiD : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 t Biopower : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 t Biopower : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TTiD : 1.89 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 2.0 t Biopower : 1.85 L/km-h (1.15 L/mph)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 t Biopower : 44.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TTiD : 75.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 t Biopower : 41.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 37.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 t Biopower 425 L 53 L to 1 s 6.9x 237x -53L
    1.9 TTiD 425 L 52 L to 1 s 6.9x 223x -53L
    2.0 t Biopower 425 L 57 L to 1 s 6.9x 214x -53L
    2.8 i V6 24V 425 L 60 L to 1 s 6.9x 152x -53L
    Vehicle 1.8 t Biopower
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 1.9 TTiD
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 223x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.0 t Biopower
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 214x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 152x
    Difference with world average -53L

    Quick notes on Saab 9-3 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 425 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 85 L
      • Max trunk load: 90 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 i 16V : 3.5 L/hp (4.7 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TiD : 2.8 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V t : 2.8 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 t : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 2.2 TiD : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TiD : 2.02 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V t : 1.89 L/km-h (1.17 L/mph)
  • 2.0 t : 1.98 L/km-h (1.23 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T : 1.85 L/km-h (1.15 L/mph)
  • 2.2 TiD : 2.13 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 i 16V t : 42.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 t : 45.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T : 44.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2 TiD : 66.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 i 16V 425 L 39 L to 1 s 6.9x 237x -53L
    1.9 TiD 425 L 47 L to 1 s 6.9x 223x -53L
    2.0 i 16V t 425 L 49 L to 1 s 6.9x 213x -53L
    2.0 t 425 L 46 L to 1 s 6.9x 213x -53L
    2.0 T 425 L 49 L to 1 s 6.9x 213x -53L
    2.2 TiD 425 L 40 L to 1 s 6.9x 196x -53L
    2.8 i V6 24V 425 L 57 L to 1 s 6.9x 152x -53L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 1.9 TiD
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 223x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V t
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.0 t
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.2 TiD
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 196x
    Difference with world average -53L
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 425 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 152x
    Difference with world average -53L

    Quick notes on Saab 9-3 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 419 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 83.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 89 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TiD : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V Bio : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TTiD : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V Bio : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V t : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V T : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.8 i V6 : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TiD : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V Bio : 2 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TTiD : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V Bio : 1.9 L/km-h (1.18 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V t : 1.86 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V T : 1.86 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 2.8 i V6 : 1.68 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 1.75 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 i 16V : 47.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 i 16V Bio : 36.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TTiD : 60.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i 16V Bio : 34.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i 16V t : 42.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i 16V T : 46.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8 i V6 : 35.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8 i V6 24V : 38.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 i 16V 419 L 39 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -59L
    1.9 TiD 419 L 43 L to 1 s 6.8x 219x -59L
    1.8 i 16V Bio 419 L 46 L to 1 s 6.8x 233x -59L
    1.9 TTiD 419 L 48 L to 1 s 6.8x 219x -59L
    2.0 i 16V Bio 419 L 48 L to 1 s 6.8x 211x -59L
    2.0 i 16V t 419 L 49 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -59L
    2.0 i 16V T 419 L 49 L to 1 s 6.8x 210x -59L
    2.8 i V6 419 L 59 L to 1 s 6.8x 150x -59L
    2.8 i V6 24V 419 L 57 L to 1 s 6.8x 150x -59L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 1.9 TiD
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V Bio
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 233x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 1.9 TTiD
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V Bio
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 211x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V t
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V T
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 49 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -59L
    Vehicle 2.8 i V6 24V
    Trunk space 419 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -59L

    Quick notes on Saab 9-3 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 235 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.4 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 58.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 95 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 0.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 t : 1.3 L/hp (1.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 T : 1.1 L/hp (1.5 L/kW)
  • 2.8 V6 Turbo : 0.9 L/hp (1.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 t : 1.09 L/km-h (0.68 L/mph)
  • 2.0 T : 1.02 L/km-h (0.63 L/mph)
  • 2.8 V6 Turbo : 0.96 L/km-h (0.6 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 t : 24.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 T : 26.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8 V6 Turbo : 22.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 t 235 L 24 L to 1 s 3.8x 118x -243L
    2.0 T 235 L 31 L to 1 s 3.8x 118x -243L
    2.8 V6 Turbo 235 L 31 L to 1 s 3.8x 84x -243L
    Vehicle 2.0 t
    Trunk space 235 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 24 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 118x
    Difference with world average -243L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 235 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 118x
    Difference with world average -243L
    Vehicle 2.8 V6 Turbo
    Trunk space 235 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 3.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 84x
    Difference with world average -243L

    Quick notes on Saab 9-3 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 494 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 98.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 83 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.9 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.0i : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0i SE : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i T : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i T SE : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i TS : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.2 TiD : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 2.3 i T SE : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.3 i : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.3 T : 2.1 L/hp (2.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 2.0i : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 2.0i SE : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i T : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i T SE : 2.15 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i TS : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 2.2 TiD : 2.47 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 2.3 i T SE : 2.41 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 2.3 i : 2.35 L/km-h (1.46 L/mph)
  • 2.3 T : 1.98 L/km-h (1.23 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2 TiD : 77.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T 494 L 72 L to 1 s 7.7x 249x +16L
    2.0i 494 L 47 L to 1 s 7.3x 249x +16L
    2.0i SE 494 L 47 L to 1 s 7.3x 249x +16L
    2.0 i T 494 L 61 L to 1 s 7.3x 249x +16L
    2.0 i T SE 494 L 61 L to 1 s 7.3x 249x +16L
    2.0 i TS 494 L 72 L to 1 s 7.3x 249x +16L
    2.2 TiD 494 L 50 L to 1 s 7.3x 228x +16L
    2.3 i T SE 494 L 47 L to 1 s 7.3x 216x +16L
    2.3 i 494 L 52 L to 1 s 7.3x 216x +16L
    2.3 T 494 L 76 L to 1 s 7.7x 216x +16L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.0i SE
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.0 i T
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.0 i T SE
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 61 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.0 i TS
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 72 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 249x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.2 TiD
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.3 i T SE
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.3 i
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 52 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average +16L
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Trunk space 494 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 76 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average +16L

    Quick notes on Saab 9-3 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 295 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 73.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 88 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 1.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 T : 1.4 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 2.3 T : 1.3 L/hp (1.7 L/kW)
  • 2.3i : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 2.3 i SE : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 T : 1.26 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • 2.3 T : 1.18 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)
  • 2.3i : 1.4 L/km-h (0.87 L/mph)
  • 2.3 i SE : 1.44 L/km-h (0.89 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 T 295 L 43 L to 1 s 4.6x 149x -183L
    2.3 T 295 L 45 L to 1 s 4.6x 129x -183L
    2.3i 295 L 31 L to 1 s 4.3x 129x -183L
    2.3 i SE 295 L 28 L to 1 s 4.3x 129x -183L
    Vehicle 2.0 T
    Trunk space 295 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 43 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 149x
    Difference with world average -183L
    Vehicle 2.3 T
    Trunk space 295 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -183L
    Vehicle 2.3i
    Trunk space 295 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -183L
    Vehicle 2.3 i SE
    Trunk space 295 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 129x
    Difference with world average -183L