Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8i V6 | 513 L | - | 7.5x | 184x | +35L |
2.0i | 513 L | - | 7.5x | 257x | +35L |
Vehicle | 2.8i V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 513 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 184x |
Difference with world average | +35L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 513 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 257x |
Difference with world average | +35L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i | 527 L | - | 7.5x | 264x | +49L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 527 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 264x |
Difference with world average | +49L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TDi | 500 L | 48 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 230x | +22L |
2.3 t | 500 L | 56 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 218x | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 230x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.3 t |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 t | 416 L | 50 L to 1 s | 5.5x | 182x | -62L |
2.2 TDi | 415 L | 38 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 191x | -63L |
2.3 T | 416 L | 60 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 182x | -62L |
3.0 TiD | 415 L | 47 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -63L |
Vehicle | 2.3 t |
---|---|
Trunk space | 416 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -62L |
Vehicle | 2.2 TDi |
Trunk space | 415 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -63L |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
Trunk space | 416 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -62L |
Vehicle | 3.0 TiD |
Trunk space | 415 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -63L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 T 16V Aero | 500 L | 76 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 218x | +22L |
2.0 T 16V | 500 L | 56 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 252x | +22L |
2.3 T 16V | 500 L | 64 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 218x | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.3 T 16V Aero |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 76 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.0 T 16V |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 252x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 2.3 T 16V |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 64 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 T | 415 L | 61 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 181x | -63L |
2.0 T | 415 L | 35 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 209x | -63L |
3.0 i V6 24V | 415 L | 50 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -63L |
Vehicle | 2.3 T |
---|---|
Trunk space | 415 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 181x |
Difference with world average | -63L |
Vehicle | 2.0 T |
Trunk space | 415 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -63L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 415 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 50 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -63L |