cat_logo
HomeSaab

9000

Saab 9000 Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Saab 9000 trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 487 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.9 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 97.4 L
    • Max trunk load: 83 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 - 16 CS : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 2.0 - 16 ND Turbo : 3.3 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 2.3 - 16 CSE : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE : 2.4 L/hp (3.3 L/kW)
  • 2.3 CS Aero : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 - 16 CS : 2.44 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)
  • 2.0 - 16 ND Turbo : 2.32 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • 2.3 - 16 CSE : 2.32 L/km-h (1.44 L/mph)
  • 2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • 2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE : 2.07 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • 2.3 CS Aero : 2.03 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE : 2.12 L/km-h (1.32 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 - 16 CS : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 - 16 ND Turbo : 56.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 - 16 CSE : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power : 55.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE : 52.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 CS Aero : 55.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE : 52.5x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 - 16 CS 487 L 45 L to 1 s 7.4x 245x +9L
    2.0 - 16 ND Turbo 488 L 54 L to 1 s 7.4x 246x +10L
    2.3 - 16 CSE 487 L 51 L to 1 s 7.4x 213x +9L
    2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power 488 L 60 L to 1 s 7.4x 213x +10L
    2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE 487 L 69 L to 1 s 7.4x 213x +9L
    2.3 CS Aero 487 L 74 L to 1 s 7.4x 213x +9L
    3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE 488 L 55 L to 1 s 7.4x 165x +10L
    Vehicle 2.0 - 16 CS
    Trunk space 487 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 245x
    Difference with world average +9L
    Vehicle 2.0 - 16 ND Turbo
    Trunk space 488 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 54 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 246x
    Difference with world average +10L
    Vehicle 2.3 - 16 CSE
    Trunk space 487 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average +9L
    Vehicle 2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power
    Trunk space 488 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 60 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average +10L
    Vehicle 2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE
    Trunk space 487 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 69 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average +9L
    Vehicle 2.3 CS Aero
    Trunk space 487 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 213x
    Difference with world average +9L
    Vehicle 3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE
    Trunk space 488 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 55 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 165x
    Difference with world average +10L

    Quick notes on Saab 9000 trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 625 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 13.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 6.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 125 L
      • Max trunk load: 83 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 10 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.3 -16 Turbo : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 16V : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0 - 16 Turbo CD : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 - 16 Turbo : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 2.3 - 16 : 4.3 L/hp (5.8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 -16 Turbo : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.3 -16 Turbo : 2.72 L/km-h (1.69 L/mph)
  • 2.0 16V : 3.29 L/km-h (2.04 L/mph)
  • 2.0 - 16 Turbo CD : 2.91 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 2.0 - 16 Turbo : 2.91 L/km-h (1.81 L/mph)
  • 2.3 - 16 : 3.05 L/km-h (1.9 L/mph)
  • 2.0 -16 Turbo : 2.84 L/km-h (1.76 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.3 -16 Turbo : 69.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 16V : 71x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 - 16 Turbo CD : 68.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 - 16 Turbo : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.3 - 16 : 65.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 -16 Turbo : 73.5x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.3 -16 Turbo 625 L 82 L to 1 s 9.5x 273x +147L
    2.0 16V 625 L 73 L to 1 s 9.5x 315x +147L
    2.0 - 16 Turbo CD 625 L 74 L to 1 s 9.5x 315x +147L
    2.0 - 16 Turbo 625 L 74 L to 1 s 9.5x 315x +147L
    2.3 - 16 625 L 63 L to 1 s 9.5x 273x +147L
    2.0 -16 Turbo 625 L 79 L to 1 s 9.5x 315x +147L
    Vehicle 2.3 -16 Turbo
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 82 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +147L
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 73 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 315x
    Difference with world average +147L
    Vehicle 2.0 - 16 Turbo CD
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 315x
    Difference with world average +147L
    Vehicle 2.0 - 16 Turbo
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 74 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 315x
    Difference with world average +147L
    Vehicle 2.3 - 16
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 63 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 273x
    Difference with world average +147L
    Vehicle 2.0 -16 Turbo
    Trunk space 625 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 79 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 315x
    Difference with world average +147L