Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 | 416 L | - | 7.6x | 167x | -62L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 416 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | -62L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 | 416 L | 69 L to 1 s | 7.6x | 167x | -62L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 416 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 69 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 167x |
Difference with world average | -62L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 | 363 L | 52 L to 1 s | 6.6x | 154x | -115L |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 363 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 52 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -115L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 i 16V | 363 L | - | 6.6x | 154x | -115L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 363 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -115L |