Seat Ibiza Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 355 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.9 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.6 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 71 L
    • Max trunk load: 67 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.3 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.0 MPI : 4.4 L/hp (6 L/kW)
  • 1.0 EcoTSI : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)
  • 1.5 TSI EVO : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 1.0 TGI : 3.9 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 1.6 TDI : 3.7 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.0 MPI : 2.1 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.0 EcoTSI : 1.84 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 1.5 TSI EVO : 1.65 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)
  • 1.0 TGI : 1.96 L/km-h (1.22 L/mph)
  • 1.6 TDI : 1.96 L/km-h (1.22 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.0 MPI : 71x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 EcoTSI : 75.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 TSI EVO : 72.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 TGI : 71x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 TDI : 88.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.0 MPI 355 L 25 L to 1 s 8.9x 355x -123L
    1.0 EcoTSI 355 L 39 L to 1 s 8.9x 355x -123L
    1.5 TSI EVO 355 L 47 L to 1 s 8.9x 237x -123L
    1.0 TGI 355 L 32 L to 1 s 8.9x 355x -123L
    1.6 TDI 355 L 32 L to 1 s 8.9x 222x -123L
    Vehicle 1.0 MPI
    Trunk space 355 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 355x
    Difference with world average -123L
    Vehicle 1.0 EcoTSI
    Trunk space 355 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 355x
    Difference with world average -123L
    Vehicle 1.5 TSI EVO
    Trunk space 355 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 47 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -123L
    Vehicle 1.0 TGI
    Trunk space 355 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 355x
    Difference with world average -123L
    Vehicle 1.6 TDI
    Trunk space 355 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 222x
    Difference with world average -123L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 292 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.5 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 58.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 62 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.0 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 1.9 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.0 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TSI : 1.59 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 1.48 L/km-h (0.92 L/mph)
  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 1.33 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDI : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.0 : 60.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TSI : 59.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 66.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 60.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TDI : 81.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.0 292 L 21 L to 1 s 6.5x 292x -186L
    1.2 TSI 292 L 29 L to 1 s 6.5x 244x -186L
    1.0 Eco TSI 292 L 33 L to 1 s 6.5x 292x -186L
    1.4 Eco TSI 292 L 41 L to 1 s 6.5x 209x -186L
    1.4 TDI 292 L 31 L to 1 s 6.5x 205x -186L
    Vehicle 1.0
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.0 Eco TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.4 Eco TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 209x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 205x
    Difference with world average -186L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 430 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 86 L
      • Max trunk load: 65 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 1.0 : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)
  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDI : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
  • 1.0 : 2.5 L/km-h (1.55 L/mph)
  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 2.18 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TSI : 2.34 L/km-h (1.45 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDI : 2.24 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 89.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 : 87.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 97.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TSI : 87.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TDI : 116.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 Eco TSI 430 L 58 L to 1 s 9.6x 308x -48L
    1.0 430 L 30 L to 1 s 9.6x 430x -48L
    1.0 Eco TSI 430 L 48 L to 1 s 9.6x 430x -48L
    1.2 TSI 430 L 41 L to 1 s 9.6x 359x -48L
    1.4 TDI 430 L 44 L to 1 s 9.6x 302x -48L
    Vehicle 1.4 Eco TSI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 58 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 308x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.0
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 430x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.0 Eco TSI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 430x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 359x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 302x
    Difference with world average -48L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 292 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.5 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 58.4 L
      • Max trunk load: 64 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 1.0 : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 1.9 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • Cupra 1.8 TSI : 1.5 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 1.48 L/km-h (0.92 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TSI : 1.59 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.0 : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 1.33 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDI : 1.52 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • Cupra 1.8 TSI : 1.24 L/km-h (0.77 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.0 Eco TSI : 67.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TSI : 59.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 : 60.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 Eco TSI : 60.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TDI : 81.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Cupra 1.8 TSI : 48.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.0 Eco TSI 292 L 34 L to 1 s 6.5x 292x -186L
    1.2 TSI 292 L 29 L to 1 s 6.5x 244x -186L
    1.0 292 L 21 L to 1 s 6.5x 292x -186L
    1.4 Eco TSI 292 L 41 L to 1 s 6.5x 209x -186L
    1.4 TDI 292 L 31 L to 1 s 6.5x 205x -186L
    Cupra 1.8 TSI 292 L 46 L to 1 s 6.5x 162x -186L
    Vehicle 1.0 Eco TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.0
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 292x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.4 Eco TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 41 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 209x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 205x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle Cupra 1.8 TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 162x
    Difference with world average -186L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 430 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.3 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 86 L
      • Max trunk load: 72 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.2 : 6.1 L/hp (8.4 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TDI : 5.7 L/hp (7.8 L/kW)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 TDI : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TSI : 3.1 L/hp (4.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.2 : 2.64 L/km-h (1.64 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TDI : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 2.03 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TSI : 2.26 L/km-h (1.4 L/mph)
  • 1.6 TDI : 2.42 L/km-h (1.5 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TSI : 2.05 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 : 78.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TDI : 110.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 72.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TSI : 81.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 TDI : 100x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TSI : 91.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.2 430 L 31 L to 1 s 9.6x 359x -48L
    1.2 TDI 430 L 31 L to 1 s 9.6x 359x -48L
    FR 1.4 TSI 430 L 57 L to 1 s 9.6x 309x -48L
    1.2 TSI 430 L 45 L to 1 s 9.6x 359x -48L
    1.6 TDI 430 L 38 L to 1 s 9.6x 269x -48L
    1.4 TSI 430 L 56 L to 1 s 9.6x 308x -48L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 359x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.2 TDI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 359x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle FR 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 57 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 309x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 45 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 359x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.6 TDI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 269x
    Difference with world average -48L
    Vehicle 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 430 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 56 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 308x
    Difference with world average -48L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 266 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 53.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 69 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.6 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TSI : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 1.2 12V : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 TDI : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TDI : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 16V : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TDI : 1.7 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 : 1.25 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TSI : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.11 L/km-h (0.69 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TSI : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)
  • 1.2 12V : 1.74 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 1.6 TDI : 1.51 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TDI : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • 1.4 16V : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TDI : 1.12 L/km-h (0.7 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 : 36.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TSI : 55.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 40x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TSI : 60.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 12V : 52.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 TDI : 67.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TDI : 83.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 16V : 48.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 TDI : 51.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 218 L 19 L to 1 s 4.1x 136x -260L
    1.2 TSI 284 L 27 L to 1 s 6.3x 237x -194L
    FR 1.4 TSI 236 L 33 L to 1 s 5.2x 170x -242L
    1.4 TSI 284 L 38 L to 1 s 6.3x 204x -194L
    1.2 12V 284 L 22 L to 1 s 6.3x 237x -194L
    1.6 TDI 284 L 28 L to 1 s 6.3x 178x -194L
    1.2 TDI 284 L 22 L to 1 s 6.3x 237x -194L
    1.4 16V 284 L 25 L to 1 s 6.3x 204x -194L
    2.0 TDI 236 L 30 L to 1 s 5.2x 120x -242L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 218 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average -260L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle FR 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 236 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -242L
    Vehicle 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.2 12V
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.6 TDI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 178x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.2 TDI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.4 16V
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 2.0 TDI
    Trunk space 236 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 120x
    Difference with world average -242L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 274 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 54.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 69 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.7 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 TDI : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)
  • 1.2 12V : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TDI : 1.7 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TDI : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TSI : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 1.65 L/km-h (1.03 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TSI : 1.62 L/km-h (1.01 L/mph)
  • 1.6 TDI : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.18 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)
  • 1.2 12V : 1.79 L/km-h (1.11 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TDI : 1.19 L/km-h (0.74 L/mph)
  • 1.2 TDI : 1.74 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TSI : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 : 37x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 49.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TSI : 57.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 TDI : 67.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 42.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 12V : 54.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 TDI : 54.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 TDI : 76.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TSI : 60.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 222 L 19 L to 1 s 4.9x 139x -256L
    1.4 292 L 26 L to 1 s 6.5x 210x -186L
    1.2 TSI 292 L 27 L to 1 s 6.5x 244x -186L
    1.6 TDI 292 L 27 L to 1 s 6.5x 183x -186L
    FR 1.4 TSI 250 L 35 L to 1 s 5.6x 180x -228L
    1.2 12V 292 L 22 L to 1 s 6.5x 244x -186L
    2.0 TDI 250 L 32 L to 1 s 5.6x 127x -228L
    1.2 TDI 292 L 22 L to 1 s 6.5x 244x -186L
    1.4 TSI 284 L 38 L to 1 s 6.3x 204x -194L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 222 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 4.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 139x
    Difference with world average -256L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.6 TDI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle FR 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.2 12V
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 2.0 TDI
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 127x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.2 TDI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -194L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 286 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.4 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.9 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 57.2 L
      • Max trunk load: 67 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 MPI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TDI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.2 : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6 TDI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.7 L/hp (2.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 MPI : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 1.67 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TDI : 1.67 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.18 L/km-h (0.73 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 MPI : 44.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 47.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TDI : 47.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 39.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 MPI 292 L 29 L to 1 s 6.5x 183x -186L
    1.4 292 L 25 L to 1 s 6.5x 210x -186L
    1.9 TDI 292 L 25 L to 1 s 6.5x 154x -186L
    1.2 292 L - 6.5x 244x -186L
    1.2 TSI 292 L - 6.5x 244x -186L
    1.6 TDI 292 L - 6.5x 244x -186L
    FR 1.4 TSI 250 L 34 L to 1 s 5.6x 180x -228L
    Vehicle 1.6 MPI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 29 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 183x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 210x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle 1.6 TDI
    Trunk space 292 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 244x
    Difference with world average -186L
    Vehicle FR 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -228L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 279 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 55.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 66 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • Cupra 1.4 TSI : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDI : 3.6 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TDI : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 TDI : 2 L/hp (2.7 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TSI : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 1.2 TDI : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.6 L/hp (2.1 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • Cupra 1.4 TSI : 1.26 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDI : 1.67 L/km-h (1.04 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TDI : 1.6 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 2.0 TDI : 1.35 L/km-h (0.84 L/mph)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 1.11 L/km-h (0.69 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 1.51 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • Cupra 1.4 TSI : 44.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 45.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TDI : 66x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TDI : 45.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.4 TSI : 37.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 : 49x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    Cupra 1.4 TSI 284 L 42 L to 1 s 6.3x 204x -194L
    1.4 284 L 25 L to 1 s 6.3x 204x -194L
    1.4 TDI 284 L 23 L to 1 s 6.3x 200x -194L
    1.9 TDI 284 L 25 L to 1 s 6.3x 150x -194L
    2.0 TDI 284 L - 6.3x 144x -194L
    1.2 TSI 284 L - 6.3x 237x -194L
    1.2 TDI 284 L - 6.3x 237x -194L
    FR 1.4 TSI 236 L 33 L to 1 s 5.2x 170x -242L
    1.6 284 L 30 L to 1 s 6.3x 178x -194L
    Vehicle Cupra 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 42 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 200x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 150x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 2.0 TDI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 144x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.2 TSI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle 1.2 TDI
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 237x
    Difference with world average -194L
    Vehicle FR 1.4 TSI
    Trunk space 236 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.2x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 170x
    Difference with world average -242L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 284 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 178x
    Difference with world average -194L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 265 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 53 L
      • Max trunk load: 66 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.4 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.2 : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • FR 1.8 : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDi : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TDi : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • FR 1.9 TDi : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.2 : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 1.39 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 1.37 L/km-h (0.85 L/mph)
  • FR 1.8 : 1.23 L/km-h (0.76 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDi : 1.51 L/km-h (0.94 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TDi : 1.41 L/km-h (0.88 L/mph)
  • FR 1.9 TDi : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 : 44.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 : 38.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 : 38.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.8 : 34x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TDi : 57.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TDi : 54.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.9 TDi : 53x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.2 265 L 20 L to 1 s 5.9x 221x -213L
    1.4 265 L 25 L to 1 s 5.9x 191x -213L
    1.6 265 L 26 L to 1 s 5.9x 166x -213L
    FR 1.8 265 L 33 L to 1 s 5.9x 149x -213L
    1.4 TDi 265 L 22 L to 1 s 5.9x 186x -213L
    1.9 TDi 265 L 27 L to 1 s 5.9x 140x -213L
    FR 1.9 TDi 265 L 30 L to 1 s 5.9x 140x -213L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 20 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 191x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 166x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle FR 1.8
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 149x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.9 TDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 27 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle FR 1.9 TDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -213L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 265 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.9 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 53 L
      • Max trunk load: 67 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.4 16V : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.2 : 4.9 L/hp (6.6 L/kW)
  • 1.2 12V : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • FR 1.8 i 20V : 1.8 L/hp (2.4 L/kW)
  • 1.9 SDi : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.4 TDi : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • Cupra 1.8 i 20V : 1.5 L/hp (2 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TDi : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • FR 1.9 TDi : 2 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • Cupra 1.9 TDI : 1.7 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0i Sport : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.4 16V : 1.39 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
  • 1.2 : 1.71 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 1.2 12V : 1.61 L/km-h (1 L/mph)
  • FR 1.8 i 20V : 1.23 L/km-h (0.76 L/mph)
  • 1.9 SDi : 1.63 L/km-h (1.01 L/mph)
  • 1.4 TDi : 1.56 L/km-h (0.97 L/mph)
  • Cupra 1.8 i 20V : 1.15 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TDi : 1.39 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
  • FR 1.9 TDi : 1.28 L/km-h (0.8 L/mph)
  • Cupra 1.9 TDI : 1.33 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)
  • 2.0i Sport : 1.34 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.4 16V : 38.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 : 44.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 12V : 44.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 SDi : 56.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 TDi : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TDi : 54.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • FR 1.9 TDi : 53x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.4 16V 265 L 25 L to 1 s 5.9x 191x -213L
    1.2 265 L 16 L to 1 s 5.9x 221x -213L
    1.2 12V 265 L 19 L to 1 s 5.9x 221x -213L
    FR 1.8 i 20V 265 L 33 L to 1 s 5.9x 149x -213L
    1.9 SDi 265 L 16 L to 1 s 5.9x 140x -213L
    1.4 TDi 265 L 21 L to 1 s 5.9x 186x -213L
    Cupra 1.8 i 20V 265 L 38 L to 1 s 5.9x 149x -213L
    1.9 TDi 265 L 31 L to 1 s 5.9x 140x -213L
    FR 1.9 TDi 265 L 30 L to 1 s 5.9x 140x -213L
    Cupra 1.9 TDI 265 L 37 L to 1 s 5.9x 140x -213L
    2.0i Sport 265 L 28 L to 1 s 5.9x 134x -213L
    Vehicle 1.4 16V
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 191x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.2 12V
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 221x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle FR 1.8 i 20V
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 149x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.9 SDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.4 TDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle Cupra 1.8 i 20V
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 149x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 1.9 TDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle FR 1.9 TDi
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 30 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle Cupra 1.9 TDI
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -213L
    Vehicle 2.0i Sport
    Trunk space 265 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.9x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 134x
    Difference with world average -213L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 250 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.6 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 50 L
      • Max trunk load: 61 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.7 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.0 i : 5 L/hp (6.8 L/kW)
  • 1.4 : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 1.4 16V : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.6 : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.8 T 20V : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)
  • 1.9 SDI : 3.7 L/hp (5 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TDI : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.0 i : 1.72 L/km-h (1.07 L/mph)
  • 1.4 : 1.59 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.4 16V : 1.47 L/km-h (0.91 L/mph)
  • 1.6 : 1.47 L/km-h (0.91 L/mph)
  • 1.8 T 20V : 1.15 L/km-h (0.71 L/mph)
  • 1.9 SDI : 1.55 L/km-h (0.96 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TDI : 1.39 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.0 i 250 L 14 L to 1 s 5.6x 250x -228L
    1.4 250 L 17 L to 1 s 5.6x 180x -228L
    1.4 16V 250 L 21 L to 1 s 5.6x 180x -228L
    1.6 250 L 21 L to 1 s 5.6x 156x -228L
    1.8 T 20V 250 L 33 L to 1 s 5.6x 140x -228L
    1.9 SDI 250 L 16 L to 1 s 5.6x 132x -228L
    1.9 TDI 250 L 22 L to 1 s 5.6x 132x -228L
    Vehicle 1.0 i
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 14 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.4
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 17 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.4 16V
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 180x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 156x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.8 T 20V
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 140x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.9 SDI
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 16 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 132x
    Difference with world average -228L
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Trunk space 250 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 22 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 132x
    Difference with world average -228L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 284 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 6.3 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 56.8 L
      • Max trunk load: 59 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 i : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i : 4.5 L/hp (6.1 L/kW)
  • 1.0 : 6 L/hp (8.2 L/kW)
  • 1.4 i 16V : 2.7 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 1.0 i : 5.4 L/hp (7.3 L/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.1 L/hp (2.8 L/kW)
  • 1.9 D : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 1.9 SDI : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TD : 3.6 L/hp (4.9 L/kW)
  • 1.9 TDI : 5.1 L/hp (6.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i : 2.3 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 1.8 L/hp (2.5 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.8 i : 1.48 L/km-h (0.92 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • 1.0 : 1.93 L/km-h (1.2 L/mph)
  • 1.4 i 16V : 1.5 L/km-h (0.93 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i : 1.59 L/km-h (0.99 L/mph)
  • 1.0 i : 1.86 L/km-h (1.16 L/mph)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 1.31 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)
  • 1.9 D : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • 1.9 SDI : 1.64 L/km-h (1.02 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TD : 1.58 L/km-h (0.98 L/mph)
  • 1.9 TDI : 2.53 L/km-h (1.57 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i : 1.38 L/km-h (0.86 L/mph)
  • 2.0 i 16V : 1.25 L/km-h (0.78 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.8 i : 36x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.4 i : 39.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 : 39.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 i : 36.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8 i 16V : 32.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 D : 46.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TD : 45.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 TDI : 94.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 i : 35.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 i 270 L 25 L to 1 s 5.7x 152x -208L
    1.4 i 270 L 18 L to 1 s 6x 194x -208L
    1.0 270 L 13 L to 1 s 5.7x 259x -208L
    1.4 i 16V 270 L 26 L to 1 s 6x 194x -208L
    1.6 i 270 L 23 L to 1 s 5.7x 169x -208L
    1.0 i 270 L 15 L to 1 s 6x 270x -208L
    1.8 i 16V 270 L 31 L to 1 s 5.7x 152x -208L
    1.9 D 270 L 19 L to 1 s 5.7x 142x -208L
    1.9 SDI 270 L - 5.7x 142x -208L
    1.9 TD 270 L 20 L to 1 s 6x 142x -208L
    1.9 TDI 455 L 40 L to 1 s 9.7x 240x -23L
    2.0 i 270 L 31 L to 1 s 5.7x 136x -208L
    2.0 i 16V 270 L 34 L to 1 s 6x 136x -208L
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 152x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.4 i
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 194x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.0
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 13 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 259x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.4 i 16V
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 194x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 23 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.0 i
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 270x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 152x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.9 D
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 19 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.9 SDI
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.9 TD
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 20 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 142x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 1.9 TDI
    Trunk space 455 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 9.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average -23L
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 31 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average -208L
    Vehicle 2.0 i 16V
    Trunk space 270 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 34 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 136x
    Difference with world average -208L

    Quick notes on Seat Ibiza trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 320 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 7.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 64 L
      • Max trunk load: 54 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.4 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 0.9 : 7.3 L/hp (10 L/kW)
  • 1.2 : 5.3 L/hp (7.3 L/kW)
  • 1.2 i : 4.5 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 1.5 : 3.8 L/hp (5.1 L/kW)
  • 1.5 i : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 1.7 D : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 1.7 i : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 0.9 : 2.48 L/km-h (1.54 L/mph)
  • 1.2 : 2.06 L/km-h (1.28 L/mph)
  • 1.2 i : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 1.5 : 1.83 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 1.5 i : 1.83 L/km-h (1.14 L/mph)
  • 1.7 D : 2.16 L/km-h (1.34 L/mph)
  • 1.7 i : 1.76 L/km-h (1.09 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.2 : 48.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.2 i : 48.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 : 50x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.5 i : 44.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 D : 53.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 i : 47.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    0.9 320 L 15 L to 1 s 6.4x 354x -158L
    1.2 320 L 21 L to 1 s 6.4x 268x -158L
    1.2 i 320 L 26 L to 1 s 6.4x 268x -158L
    1.5 320 L 26 L to 1 s 6.4x 219x -158L
    1.5 i 320 L 28 L to 1 s 6.4x 219x -158L
    1.7 D 320 L 18 L to 1 s 6.4x 187x -158L
    1.7 i 320 L 32 L to 1 s 6.4x 191x -158L
    Vehicle 0.9
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 15 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 354x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.2
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 21 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 268x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.2 i
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 268x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.5
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 26 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.5 i
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 219x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.7 D
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 187x
    Difference with world average -158L
    Vehicle 1.7 i
    Trunk space 320 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 32 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 191x
    Difference with world average -158L