2017 Ibiza V
2015 Ibiza IV (facelift 2015)
2015 Ibiza IV ST (facelift 2015)
2015 Ibiza IV SC (facelift 2015)
2012 Ibiza IV ST (facelift 2012)
2012 Ibiza IV SC (facelift 2012)
2012 Ibiza IV (facelift 2012)
2008 Ibiza IV
2008 Ibiza IV SC
2006 Ibiza III (facelift 2006)
2002 Ibiza III
1999 Ibiza II (facelift 1999)
1993 Ibiza II
1984 Ibiza I
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 MPI | 355 L | 25 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 355x | -123L |
1.0 EcoTSI | 355 L | 39 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 355x | -123L |
1.5 TSI EVO | 355 L | 47 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 237x | -123L |
1.0 TGI | 355 L | 32 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 355x | -123L |
1.6 TDI | 355 L | 32 L to 1 s | 8.9x | 222x | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.0 MPI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 355x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.0 EcoTSI |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 355x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI EVO |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.0 TGI |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 355x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 222x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 | 292 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 292x | -186L |
1.2 TSI | 292 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
1.0 Eco TSI | 292 L | 33 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 292x | -186L |
1.4 Eco TSI | 292 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 209x | -186L |
1.4 TDI | 292 L | 31 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 205x | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.0 Eco TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Eco TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 Eco TSI | 430 L | 58 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 308x | -48L |
1.0 | 430 L | 30 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 430x | -48L |
1.0 Eco TSI | 430 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 430x | -48L |
1.2 TSI | 430 L | 41 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 359x | -48L |
1.4 TDI | 430 L | 44 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 302x | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Eco TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 308x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 430x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.0 Eco TSI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 430x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 359x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 302x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 Eco TSI | 292 L | 34 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 292x | -186L |
1.2 TSI | 292 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
1.0 | 292 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 292x | -186L |
1.4 Eco TSI | 292 L | 41 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 209x | -186L |
1.4 TDI | 292 L | 31 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 205x | -186L |
Cupra 1.8 TSI | 292 L | 46 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 162x | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.0 Eco TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Eco TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | Cupra 1.8 TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 162x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 430 L | 31 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 359x | -48L |
1.2 TDI | 430 L | 31 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 359x | -48L |
FR 1.4 TSI | 430 L | 57 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 309x | -48L |
1.2 TSI | 430 L | 45 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 359x | -48L |
1.6 TDI | 430 L | 38 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 269x | -48L |
1.4 TSI | 430 L | 56 L to 1 s | 9.6x | 308x | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 359x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TDI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 359x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | FR 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 309x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 45 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 359x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 269x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 430 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 56 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 308x |
Difference with world average | -48L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 218 L | 19 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 136x | -260L |
1.2 TSI | 284 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 237x | -194L |
FR 1.4 TSI | 236 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 170x | -242L |
1.4 TSI | 284 L | 38 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 204x | -194L |
1.2 12V | 284 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 237x | -194L |
1.6 TDI | 284 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 178x | -194L |
1.2 TDI | 284 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 237x | -194L |
1.4 16V | 284 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 204x | -194L |
2.0 TDI | 236 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 120x | -242L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 218 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -260L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | FR 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 236 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -242L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.2 12V |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TDI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 236 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 120x |
Difference with world average | -242L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 | 222 L | 19 L to 1 s | 4.9x | 139x | -256L |
1.4 | 292 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 210x | -186L |
1.2 TSI | 292 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
1.6 TDI | 292 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 183x | -186L |
FR 1.4 TSI | 250 L | 35 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 180x | -228L |
1.2 12V | 292 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
2.0 TDI | 250 L | 32 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 127x | -228L |
1.2 TDI | 292 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
1.4 TSI | 284 L | 38 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 204x | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 222 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 139x |
Difference with world average | -256L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | FR 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.2 12V |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 127x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TDI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 MPI | 292 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 183x | -186L |
1.4 | 292 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 210x | -186L |
1.9 TDI | 292 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.5x | 154x | -186L |
1.2 | 292 L | - | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
1.2 TSI | 292 L | - | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
1.6 TDI | 292 L | - | 6.5x | 244x | -186L |
FR 1.4 TSI | 250 L | 34 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 180x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.6 MPI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 1.6 TDI |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | FR 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cupra 1.4 TSI | 284 L | 42 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 204x | -194L |
1.4 | 284 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 204x | -194L |
1.4 TDI | 284 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 200x | -194L |
1.9 TDI | 284 L | 25 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 150x | -194L |
2.0 TDI | 284 L | - | 6.3x | 144x | -194L |
1.2 TSI | 284 L | - | 6.3x | 237x | -194L |
1.2 TDI | 284 L | - | 6.3x | 237x | -194L |
FR 1.4 TSI | 236 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.2x | 170x | -242L |
1.6 | 284 L | 30 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 178x | -194L |
Vehicle | Cupra 1.4 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 150x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TSI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | 1.2 TDI |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 237x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | FR 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 236 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 170x |
Difference with world average | -242L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 284 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 178x |
Difference with world average | -194L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 265 L | 20 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 221x | -213L |
1.4 | 265 L | 25 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 191x | -213L |
1.6 | 265 L | 26 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 166x | -213L |
FR 1.8 | 265 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 149x | -213L |
1.4 TDi | 265 L | 22 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 186x | -213L |
1.9 TDi | 265 L | 27 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -213L |
FR 1.9 TDi | 265 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 166x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | FR 1.8 |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | FR 1.9 TDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 16V | 265 L | 25 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 191x | -213L |
1.2 | 265 L | 16 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 221x | -213L |
1.2 12V | 265 L | 19 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 221x | -213L |
FR 1.8 i 20V | 265 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 149x | -213L |
1.9 SDi | 265 L | 16 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -213L |
1.4 TDi | 265 L | 21 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 186x | -213L |
Cupra 1.8 i 20V | 265 L | 38 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 149x | -213L |
1.9 TDi | 265 L | 31 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -213L |
FR 1.9 TDi | 265 L | 30 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -213L |
Cupra 1.9 TDI | 265 L | 37 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 140x | -213L |
2.0i Sport | 265 L | 28 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 134x | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.2 12V |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | FR 1.8 i 20V |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.9 SDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 186x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | Cupra 1.8 i 20V |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | FR 1.9 TDi |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | Cupra 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | 2.0i Sport |
Trunk space | 265 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 134x |
Difference with world average | -213L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 i | 250 L | 14 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 250x | -228L |
1.4 | 250 L | 17 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 180x | -228L |
1.4 16V | 250 L | 21 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 180x | -228L |
1.6 | 250 L | 21 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 156x | -228L |
1.8 T 20V | 250 L | 33 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 140x | -228L |
1.9 SDI | 250 L | 16 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 132x | -228L |
1.9 TDI | 250 L | 22 L to 1 s | 5.6x | 132x | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 250x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 180x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 156x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.8 T 20V |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.9 SDI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 16 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 132x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 250 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 132x |
Difference with world average | -228L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i | 270 L | 25 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 152x | -208L |
1.4 i | 270 L | 18 L to 1 s | 6x | 194x | -208L |
1.0 | 270 L | 13 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 259x | -208L |
1.4 i 16V | 270 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6x | 194x | -208L |
1.6 i | 270 L | 23 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 169x | -208L |
1.0 i | 270 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6x | 270x | -208L |
1.8 i 16V | 270 L | 31 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 152x | -208L |
1.9 D | 270 L | 19 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 142x | -208L |
1.9 SDI | 270 L | - | 5.7x | 142x | -208L |
1.9 TD | 270 L | 20 L to 1 s | 6x | 142x | -208L |
1.9 TDI | 455 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.7x | 240x | -23L |
2.0 i | 270 L | 31 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 136x | -208L |
2.0 i 16V | 270 L | 34 L to 1 s | 6x | 136x | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.0 |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 259x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.0 i |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 270x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 152x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 19 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.9 SDI |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 142x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 1.9 TDI |
Trunk space | 455 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 240x |
Difference with world average | -23L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 136x |
Difference with world average | -208L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 | 320 L | 15 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 354x | -158L |
1.2 | 320 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 268x | -158L |
1.2 i | 320 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 268x | -158L |
1.5 | 320 L | 26 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 219x | -158L |
1.5 i | 320 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 219x | -158L |
1.7 D | 320 L | 18 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 187x | -158L |
1.7 i | 320 L | 32 L to 1 s | 6.4x | 191x | -158L |
Vehicle | 0.9 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 354x |
Difference with world average | -158L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | -158L |
Vehicle | 1.2 i |
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | -158L |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -158L |
Vehicle | 1.5 i |
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 219x |
Difference with world average | -158L |
Vehicle | 1.7 D |
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -158L |
Vehicle | 1.7 i |
Trunk space | 320 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 191x |
Difference with world average | -158L |