Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TSI | 230 L | 30 L to 1 s | 3.8x | 116x | -248L |
1.5 TSI | 230 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4x | 154x | -248L |
2.0 TDI | 230 L | 25 L to 1 s | 4x | 117x | -248L |
1.4 TSI | 230 L | 26 L to 1 s | 4x | 165x | -248L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TSI |
---|---|
Trunk space | 230 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 30 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 116x |
Difference with world average | -248L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TSI |
Trunk space | 230 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -248L |
Vehicle | 2.0 TDI |
Trunk space | 230 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 117x |
Difference with world average | -248L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TSI |
Trunk space | 230 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 165x |
Difference with world average | -248L |