Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.9 TD | 780 L | 51 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 271x | +302L |
2.9 D | 780 L | 40 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 271x | +302L |
2.3 i 16V | 780 L | 48 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 340x | +302L |
2.3 D | 780 L | 35 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 339x | +302L |
2.3 TD | 780 L | 43 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 339x | +302L |
3.2 i 24V | 780 L | 80 L to 1 s | 10.4x | 244x | +302L |
Vehicle | 2.9 TD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 51 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 2.9 D |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 2.3 i 16V |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 48 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 340x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 2.3 D |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 339x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 2.3 TD |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 339x |
Difference with world average | +302L |
Vehicle | 3.2 i 24V |
Trunk space | 780 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 80 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 244x |
Difference with world average | +302L |