Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 385 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 241x | -93L |
2.0i | 385 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7.7x | 193x | -93L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 385 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 241x |
Difference with world average | -93L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 385 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 193x |
Difference with world average | -93L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 380 L | 32 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 238x | -98L |
2.0i | 380 L | 38 L to 1 s | 6.9x | 190x | -98L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 380 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -98L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 380 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 190x |
Difference with world average | -98L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i | 460 L | 46 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 231x | -18L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 46 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 1270 L | 106 L to 1 s | 23.1x | 794x | +792L |
1.6i sport | 1270 L | 109 L to 1 s | 23.1x | 794x | +792L |
2.0i | 1270 L | 121 L to 1 s | 23.1x | 637x | +792L |
2.0i sport | 1270 L | 121 L to 1 s | 23.1x | 637x | +792L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 106 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 23.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 794x |
Difference with world average | +792L |
Vehicle | 1.6i sport |
Trunk space | 1270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 109 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 23.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 794x |
Difference with world average | +792L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 1270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 121 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 23.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 637x |
Difference with world average | +792L |
Vehicle | 2.0i sport |
Trunk space | 1270 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 121 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 23.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 637x |
Difference with world average | +792L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i | 460 L | 38 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 288x | -18L |
1.6i sport | 460 L | 38 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 288x | -18L |
2.0i | 460 L | 44 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 231x | -18L |
2.0i sport | 460 L | 44 L to 1 s | 8.4x | 231x | -18L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 288x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 1.6i sport |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 288x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | 2.0i sport |
Trunk space | 460 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 231x |
Difference with world average | -18L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 395 L | 47 L to 1 s | 7.9x | 198x | -83L |
1.6i 16V | 356 L | 29 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 223x | -122L |
WRX 2.0 16V | 356 L | 60 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 179x | -122L |
WRX 2.0i 16V | 356 L | 61 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 179x | -122L |
WRX STi 2.0 16V | 356 L | 68 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 179x | -122L |
WRX 2.5 Turbo | 355 L | 61 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 144x | -123L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 395 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 47 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 198x |
Difference with world average | -83L |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | WRX STi 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 68 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 Turbo |
Trunk space | 355 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 61 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 144x |
Difference with world average | -123L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 401 L | 41 L to 1 s | 8x | 201x | -77L |
1.5 16V | 401 L | 32 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 268x | -77L |
1.6i | 353 L | 29 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 221x | -125L |
WRX 2.0i 16V | 401 L | 72 L to 1 s | 8x | 201x | -77L |
RS 2.5i 16V | 454 L | - | 9.1x | 185x | -24L |
WRX STi 2.0 16V | 401 L | 77 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 201x | -77L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 401 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -77L |
Vehicle | 1.5 16V |
Trunk space | 401 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 268x |
Difference with world average | -77L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Trunk space | 353 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -125L |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 401 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 72 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -77L |
Vehicle | RS 2.5i 16V |
Trunk space | 454 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 185x |
Difference with world average | -24L |
Vehicle | WRX STi 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 401 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 77 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -77L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 | 314 L | 40 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 128x | -164L |
1.6 | 365 L | 31 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 229x | -113L |
2.0 | 314 L | - | 6.3x | 157x | -164L |
2.2i 16V | 203 L | - | 4.1x | 92x | -275L |
2.0 Turbo | 365 L | - | - | 183x | -113L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 314 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 128x |
Difference with world average | -164L |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Trunk space | 365 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | -113L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 314 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 157x |
Difference with world average | -164L |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Trunk space | 203 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 92x |
Difference with world average | -275L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Trunk space | 365 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -113L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 | 356 L | 37 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 179x | -122L |
1.8i | 356 L | 32 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 196x | -122L |
1.6i | 356 L | 29 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 223x | -122L |
1.5i 16V | 356 L | - | 7.1x | 238x | -122L |
2.0 16V | 356 L | 39 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 179x | -122L |
2.0i Turbo | 365 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.3x | 183x | -113L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 196x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 1.5i 16V |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 238x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Trunk space | 356 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 39 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 179x |
Difference with world average | -122L |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo |
Trunk space | 365 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 183x |
Difference with world average | -113L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 Turbo | 353 L | 59 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 177x | -125L |
2.0i | 353 L | 38 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 177x | -125L |
1.8i | 353 L | 33 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 194x | -125L |
1.6i | 353 L | 28 L to 1 s | 7.1x | 221x | -125L |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 353 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | -125L |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Trunk space | 353 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 38 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 177x |
Difference with world average | -125L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Trunk space | 353 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 33 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 194x |
Difference with world average | -125L |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Trunk space | 353 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 221x |
Difference with world average | -125L |