Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2d | 510 L | - | 11.9x | 409x | +32L |
1.5i | 510 L | - | 11.9x | 349x | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.2d |
---|---|
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 409x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Trunk space | 510 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 349x |
Difference with world average | +32L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 495 L | - | 11.5x | 361x | +17L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 495 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 11.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 361x |
Difference with world average | +17L |