cat_logo
HomeSuzuki

Cultus

Suzuki Cultus Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Choose Generation

Quick notes on Suzuki Cultus trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 375 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.3 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 3.8 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 75 L
    • Max trunk load: 67 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.8 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.4 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.8 i 16V : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)

    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.8 i 16V 375 L - 7.4x 204x -103L
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Trunk space 375 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 204x
    Difference with world average -103L

    Quick notes on Suzuki Cultus trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 363 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 72.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 52 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.9 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.6 : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 1.3 : 5.1 L/hp (7 L/kW)
  • 1.6 4 WD : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i 4 WD : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)
  • 1.6 i : 3.9 L/hp (5.3 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.6 : 1.99 L/km-h (1.24 L/mph)
  • 1.3 : 2.21 L/km-h (1.37 L/mph)
  • 1.6 4 WD : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)
  • 1.6 i 4 WD : 2.04 L/km-h (1.27 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.6 : 59.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.3 : 58.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6 4 WD : 51.9x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.6 363 L - 9.1x 228x -115L
    1.3 365 L - 9.1x 281x -113L
    1.6 4 WD 363 L - 9.6x 228x -115L
    1.6 i 4 WD 363 L - 9.6x 228x -115L
    1.6 i 363 L - 9.1x 228x -115L
    Vehicle 1.6
    Trunk space 363 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average -115L
    Vehicle 1.3
    Trunk space 365 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 281x
    Difference with world average -113L
    Vehicle 1.6 4 WD
    Trunk space 363 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average -115L
    Vehicle 1.6 i 4 WD
    Trunk space 363 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9.6x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average -115L
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Trunk space 363 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 9.1x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 228x
    Difference with world average -115L

    Quick notes on Suzuki Cultus trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 215 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.2 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 107.5 L
      • Max trunk load: 49 kg
      • Interior transformation: none
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.3 : 3.2 L/hp (4.3 L/kW)
  • 1.3 i : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 1.0 i : 3.8 L/hp (5.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.3 : 1.34 L/km-h (0.83 L/mph)
  • 1.3 i : 1.3 L/km-h (0.81 L/mph)
  • 1.0 i : 1.48 L/km-h (0.92 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.3 : 37.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.3 i : 33.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.0 i : 37.1x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.3 215 L 17 L to 1 s 5.4x 166x -263L
    1.3 i 215 L - 5.4x 166x -263L
    1.0 i 215 L - 5.4x 217x -263L
    Vehicle 1.3
    Trunk space 215 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 17 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 166x
    Difference with world average -263L
    Vehicle 1.3 i
    Trunk space 215 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 166x
    Difference with world average -263L
    Vehicle 1.0 i
    Trunk space 215 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 5.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 217x
    Difference with world average -263L

    Quick notes on Suzuki Cultus trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 258 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 5.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 2.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 51.6 L
      • Max trunk load: 49 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.5 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 4 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.0 i : 5.3 L/hp (7.2 L/kW)
  • 1.3 4 WD : 3.3 L/hp (4.5 L/kW)
  • 1.3 i : 3.9 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 1.3 GTi : 2.2 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 1.3 i 4WD : 3.9 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.0 i : 1.93 L/km-h (1.2 L/mph)
  • 1.3 4 WD : 1.4 L/km-h (0.87 L/mph)
  • 1.3 i : 1.7 L/km-h (1.06 L/mph)
  • 1.3 GTi : 1.2 L/km-h (0.75 L/mph)
  • 1.3 i 4WD : 1.73 L/km-h (1.08 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.0 i : 38.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.3 4 WD : 30.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.3 i : 48.3x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.3 GTi : 31.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.3 i 4WD : 42.4x (Trunk/Consumption)

    • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.0 i 280 L - 7x 282x -198L
    1.3 4 WD 226 L 18 L to 1 s 5.7x 174x -252L
    1.3 i 280 L - 7x 216x -198L
    1.3 GTi 226 L 25 L to 1 s 5.7x 174x -252L
    1.3 i 4WD 280 L - 7.4x 216x -198L
    Vehicle 1.0 i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 282x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.3 4 WD
    Trunk space 226 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 18 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average -252L
    Vehicle 1.3 i
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -198L
    Vehicle 1.3 GTi
    Trunk space 226 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 25 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 174x
    Difference with world average -252L
    Vehicle 1.3 i 4WD
    Trunk space 280 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 7.4x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 216x
    Difference with world average -198L