Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 TD | 500 L | - | 13.5x | 356x | +22L |
1.4 i | 500 L | 42 L to 1 s | 13.5x | 356x | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TD |
---|---|
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 356x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 500 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 42 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 356x |
Difference with world average | +22L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 | 215 L | 15 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 153x | -263L |
1.4 D | 215 L | 13 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 153x | -263L |
1.4 i | 215 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.8x | 153x | -263L |
1.4 TD | 215 L | - | 5.8x | 153x | -263L |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 215 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -263L |
Vehicle | 1.4 D |
Trunk space | 215 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -263L |
Vehicle | 1.4 i |
Trunk space | 215 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -263L |
Vehicle | 1.4 TD |
Trunk space | 215 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 153x |
Difference with world average | -263L |