Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 24V | 400 L | - | 6.7x | 201x | -78L |
3.0 i 24V | 400 L | 49 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 133x | -78L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 24V | 400 L | - | 6.7x | 201x | -78L |
2.0 i 16V RS200 | 400 L | 44 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 200x | -78L |
3.0 i 24V | 400 L | 49 L to 1 s | 6.7x | 133x | -78L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 24V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V RS200 |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 44 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i 24V |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 49 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 133x |
Difference with world average | -78L |