Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 377 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 315x | -101L |
1.8 | 377 L | 36 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 210x | -101L |
2.0 | 297 L | 29 L to 1 s | 5.9x | 149x | -181L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 377 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 315x |
Difference with world average | -101L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Trunk space | 377 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -101L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 297 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 149x |
Difference with world average | -181L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 377 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.5x | 315x | -101L |
1.8 | 377 L | 36 L to 1 s | 8.8x | 210x | -101L |
2.0 | 538 L | - | 10.8x | 271x | +60L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 377 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 315x |
Difference with world average | -101L |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Trunk space | 377 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 8.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 210x |
Difference with world average | -101L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 538 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 271x |
Difference with world average | +60L |