Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 453 L | - | 6.7x | 131x | -25L |
2.5 | 453 L | - | 7x | 182x | -25L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 453 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 131x |
Difference with world average | -25L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Trunk space | 453 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 182x |
Difference with world average | -25L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 | 269 L | - | 3.7x | 101x | -209L |
3.5 V6 | 269 L | - | 3.7x | 78x | -209L |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 269 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 101x |
Difference with world average | -209L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Trunk space | 269 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 78x |
Difference with world average | -209L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 391 L | 57 L to 1 s | 6x | 113x | -87L |
2.7 | 391 L | 40 L to 1 s | 5.4x | 146x | -87L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 57 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 113x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
Trunk space | 391 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 146x |
Difference with world average | -87L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.7 | 292 L | 31 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 109x | -186L |
3.3 V6 | 292 L | 37 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 88x | -186L |
3.5 V6 | 292 L | 37 L to 1 s | 4.1x | 84x | -186L |
Vehicle | 2.7 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 31 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 109x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 3.3 V6 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 88x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Trunk space | 292 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 37 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 4.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -186L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 16V | 1090 L | 106 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 461x | +612L |
2.4 i 16V 4WD | 1090 L | 102 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 461x | +612L |
3.0 i V6 24V 4WD Limited | 1090 L | 130 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 364x | +612L |
3.3 i V6 24V | 1090 L | - | 14.5x | 329x | +612L |
3.0 V6 24V | 1090 L | 135 L to 1 s | 14.5x | 364x | +612L |
3.3 i V6 24V 4WD | 1090 L | - | 14.5x | 329x | +612L |
3.3 i V6 24V Hybrid | 1090 L | 147 L to 1 s | 16.8x | 330x | +612L |
Vehicle | 2.4 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 106 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 461x |
Difference with world average | +612L |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 16V 4WD |
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 102 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 461x |
Difference with world average | +612L |
Vehicle | 3.0 i V6 24V 4WD Limited |
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 130 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 364x |
Difference with world average | +612L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 24V |
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 329x |
Difference with world average | +612L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 135 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 364x |
Difference with world average | +612L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 24V 4WD |
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 14.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 329x |
Difference with world average | +612L |
Vehicle | 3.3 i V6 24V Hybrid |
Trunk space | 1090 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 147 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 16.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 330x |
Difference with world average | +612L |