Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i | 810 L | - | 13.5x | 405x | +332L |
2.0 i 16V D-4 | 810 L | - | 13.5x | 405x | +332L |
2.0 i 16V | 810 L | - | 13.5x | 405x | +332L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 810 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 405x |
Difference with world average | +332L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V D-4 |
Trunk space | 810 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 405x |
Difference with world average | +332L |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Trunk space | 810 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 13.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 405x |
Difference with world average | +332L |