2019 RAV4 V
2016 RAV4 IV (facelift 2015)
2013 RAV4 IV
2012 RAV4 III (XA30, facelift 2011)
2009 RAV4 III (XA30, facelift 2008)
2009 RAV4 III (XA30, facelift 2008) Long
2006 RAV4 III (XA30)
2006 RAV4 III (XA30) Long
2004 RAV4 II (XA20, facelift 2003) 3-door
2004 RAV4 II (XA20, facelift 2003) 5-door
2001 RAV4 II (XA20) 5-door
2001 RAV4 II (XA20) 3-door
1997 RAV4 I (XA10, facelift 1997) 3-door
1997 RAV4 I (XA10, facelift 1997) 5-door
1998 RAV4 I Soft top (XA10)
1996 RAV4 I (XA10) 5-door
1995 RAV4 I (XA10) 3-door
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 | 1048 L | - | 19.1x | 421x | +570L |
2.0 | 580 L | 55 L to 1 s | 10.5x | 292x | +102L |
TRD Off-Road 2.5 | 1065 L | - | 19.4x | 428x | +587L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 1048 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 19.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 421x |
Difference with world average | +570L |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Trunk space | 580 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 10.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 292x |
Difference with world average | +102L |
Vehicle | TRD Off-Road 2.5 |
Trunk space | 1065 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 19.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 428x |
Difference with world average | +587L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Valvematic | 547 L | 58 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 275x | +69L |
2.0 D-4D | 547 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 274x | +69L |
2.5 | 1087 L | - | 18.1x | 436x | +609L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Valvematic |
---|---|
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 275x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 274x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Trunk space | 1087 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 18.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 436x |
Difference with world average | +609L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D-4D | 547 L | 55 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 274x | +69L |
2.0 Velvematic | 547 L | 54 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 275x | +69L |
2.2 D-CAT | 547 L | 58 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 245x | +69L |
2.2 D-4D | 547 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.1x | 245x | +69L |
Vehicle | 2.0 D-4D |
---|---|
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 55 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 274x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | 2.0 Velvematic |
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 54 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 275x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Trunk space | 547 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 245x |
Difference with world average | +69L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 D-CAT | 586 L | 67 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 263x | +108L |
2.2 D-4D | 586 L | 62 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 263x | +108L |
2.0 VVT-i | 586 L | 59 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 293x | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
---|---|
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 62 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.0 VVT-i |
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 D-4D | 586 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 263x | +108L |
2.0 VVT-i | 586 L | 60 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 293x | +108L |
2.2 D-CAT | 586 L | 67 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 263x | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-4D |
---|---|
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.0 VVT-i |
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 60 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.5 V6 | 348 L | - | 5.8x | 101x | -130L |
2.5 VVT-i | 348 L | - | 5.8x | 140x | -130L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 348 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 101x |
Difference with world average | -130L |
Vehicle | 2.5 VVT-i |
Trunk space | 348 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 140x |
Difference with world average | -130L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 VVT-i | 586 L | 58 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 293x | +108L |
2.2 D-AD | 586 L | 59 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 263x | +108L |
2.2 D-CAT | 586 L | 67 L to 1 s | 9.8x | 263x | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.0 VVT-i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 58 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 293x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-AD |
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 59 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | 2.2 D-CAT |
Trunk space | 586 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 67 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 9.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 263x |
Difference with world average | +108L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 VVT-i | 348 L | - | 5.8x | 147x | -130L |
3.5 V6 | 348 L | - | 5.8x | 101x | -130L |
Vehicle | 2.4 VVT-i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 348 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 147x |
Difference with world average | -130L |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Trunk space | 348 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.8x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 101x |
Difference with world average | -130L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 VVTi | 150 L | 13 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 84x | -328L |
2.0i 16V | 150 L | 15 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 75x | -328L |
2.0 16V D-4D | 150 L | 13 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 75x | -328L |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 VVTi | 400 L | 34 L to 1 s | 7x | 223x | -78L |
2.4i | 678 L | - | 12.1x | 287x | +200L |
2.0i 16V | 400 L | 40 L to 1 s | 7x | 200x | -78L |
2.0 16V D-4D | 400 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7x | 201x | -78L |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 223x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
Trunk space | 678 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 12.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 287x |
Difference with world average | +200L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 40 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 201x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 410 L | 41 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 205x | -68L |
1.8 VVTi | 410 L | 35 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 229x | -68L |
2.0 16V D-4D | 410 L | 36 L to 1 s | 7.2x | 206x | -68L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 410 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 41 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -68L |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
Trunk space | 410 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 35 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 229x |
Difference with world average | -68L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Trunk space | 410 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 36 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -68L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 150 L | 15 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 75x | -328L |
1.8 VVTi | 150 L | 13 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 84x | -328L |
2.0 16V D-4D | 150 L | 13 L to 1 s | 2.6x | 75x | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 15 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 1.8 VVTi |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 84x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V D-4D |
Trunk space | 150 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 13 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 2.6x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 75x |
Difference with world average | -328L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 173 L | - | 3x | 87x | -305L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 173 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 87x |
Difference with world average | -305L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 409 L | - | 7.1x | 205x | -69L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 409 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.1x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -69L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V | 173 L | - | 3x | 87x | -305L |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 173 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 87x |
Difference with world average | -305L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V | 407 L | - | 7x | 204x | -71L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 407 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -71L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4i | 400 L | - | 7x | 169x | -78L |
2.0i 16V | 176 L | - | 3x | 88x | -302L |
Vehicle | 2.4i |
---|---|
Trunk space | 400 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -78L |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Trunk space | 176 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 88x |
Difference with world average | -302L |