Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5.7 V8 | 535 L | - | 5.4x | 94x | +57L |
Vehicle | 5.7 V8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 535 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 94x |
Difference with world average | +57L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4.7 V8 32V | 785 L | - | 7.9x | 168x | +307L |
4.7 V8 32V AWD | 2300 L | 189 L to 1 s | 23.2x | 493x | +1822L |
5.7i V8 32V AWD | 2300 L | - | 23.2x | - | +1822L |
Vehicle | 4.7 V8 32V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 785 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.9x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 168x |
Difference with world average | +307L |
Vehicle | 4.7 V8 32V AWD |
Trunk space | 2300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 189 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 23.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 493x |
Difference with world average | +1822L |
Vehicle | 5.7i V8 32V AWD |
Trunk space | 2300 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 23.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | +1822L |