Vauxhall Antara Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Vauxhall Antara trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 420 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 9.3 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 4.2 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 84 L
    • Max trunk load: 109 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.3 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.1 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.2 CDTI : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.2 CDTI : 2.19 L/km-h (1.36 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.2 CDTI : 53.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.2 CDTI 420 L 44 L to 1 s 6.5x 188x -58L
    Vehicle 2.2 CDTI
    Trunk space 420 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 6.5x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 188x
    Difference with world average -58L

    Quick notes on Vauxhall Antara trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 370 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 8.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 3.7 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 74 L
      • Max trunk load: 104 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 2.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.3 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 6 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)
  • 2.4 16V : 2.6 L/hp (3.6 L/kW)
  • 3.2 V6 24V : 1.6 L/hp (2.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC : 2.03 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)
  • 2.4 16V : 2.11 L/km-h (1.31 L/mph)
  • 3.2 V6 24V : 1.82 L/km-h (1.13 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC : 48.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.4 16V : 38.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.2 V6 24V : 31.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.0 CDTi ECOTEC 370 L 38 L to 1 s 5.7x 186x -108L
    2.4 16V 370 L 33 L to 1 s 5.7x 154x -108L
    3.2 V6 24V 370 L 44 L to 1 s 5.7x 116x -108L
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTi ECOTEC
    Trunk space 370 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 38 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 186x
    Difference with world average -108L
    Vehicle 2.4 16V
    Trunk space 370 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 154x
    Difference with world average -108L
    Vehicle 3.2 V6 24V
    Trunk space 370 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 44 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 5.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 116x
    Difference with world average -108L