Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 | 309 L | - | 7.7x | 258x | -169L |
1.2 Turbo | 309 L | - | 7x | 258x | -169L |
1.5 Turbo D BlueInjection | 309 L | - | 7.5x | 206x | -169L |
E 50 kWh | 309 L | - | - | - | -169L |
Vehicle | 1.2 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 309 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 258x |
Difference with world average | -169L |
Vehicle | 1.2 Turbo |
Trunk space | 309 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 258x |
Difference with world average | -169L |
Vehicle | 1.5 Turbo D BlueInjection |
Trunk space | 309 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 7.5x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 206x |
Difference with world average | -169L |
Vehicle | E 50 kWh |
Trunk space | 309 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | - |
Difference with world average | -169L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4i Turbo | 280 L | 32 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 205x | -198L |
1.4 ecoFLEX | 280 L | 21 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 200x | -198L |
1.3 CDTi ecoFLEX | 280 L | 20 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 224x | -198L |
1.0 Turbo ecoFLEX | 280 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 280x | -198L |
1.4i Turbo ecoFLEX | 280 L | 27 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 205x | -198L |
1.4i ecoFLEX | 285 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 204x | -193L |
VXR 1.6i | 280 L | 43 L to 1 s | 6.2x | 175x | -198L |
GSi 1.4 Turbo | 280 L | - | 6.2x | 205x | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.4i Turbo |
---|---|
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 32 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.4 ecoFLEX |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 21 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 200x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.3 CDTi ecoFLEX |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 224x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.0 Turbo ecoFLEX |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 280x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.4i Turbo ecoFLEX |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 1.4i ecoFLEX |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | VXR 1.6i |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 43 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | GSi 1.4 Turbo |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.2x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 205x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 CDTi | 285 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 228x | -193L |
1.2i 16V ECOTEC | 285 L | 23 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 232x | -193L |
1.7 CDTi | 285 L | 28 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 169x | -193L |
1.2i 16V | 285 L | 22 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 232x | -193L |
1.4i 16V ECOTEC | 285 L | 24 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 209x | -193L |
1.0i | 285 L | 18 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 286x | -193L |
1.4T | 285 L | 29 L to 1 s | 6.3x | 209x | -193L |
1.4i ECOTEC | 285 L | - | 6.3x | 204x | -193L |
1.0i ECOTEC | 285 L | - | 6.3x | 286x | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.3 CDTi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 228x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.2i 16V ECOTEC |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.7 CDTi |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 28 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 169x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.2i 16V |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 232x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.4i 16V ECOTEC |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 24 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.0i |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.4T |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 209x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.4i ECOTEC |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 204x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | 1.0i ECOTEC |
Trunk space | 285 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 6.3x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 286x |
Difference with world average | -193L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 CDTi | 260 L | 20 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 208x | -218L |
1.7 CDTi | 260 L | 26 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 154x | -218L |
1.8i | 260 L | 34 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 145x | -218L |
1.4i | 260 L | 26 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 187x | -218L |
1.2i | 260 L | 23 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 212x | -218L |
1.0i | 260 L | 18 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 261x | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.3 CDTi |
---|---|
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 208x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.7 CDTi |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 34 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 145x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 26 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.2i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 23 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 212x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.0i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 261x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2i 16V | 260 L | 20 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 217x | -218L |
1.2i | 260 L | 14 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 218x | -218L |
1.4i 16V | 260 L | 25 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 187x | -218L |
1.4i | 260 L | 18 L to 1 s | - | 187x | -218L |
1.4 Si | 260 L | 22 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 187x | -218L |
1.5 D | 260 L | 14 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 175x | -218L |
1.5 TD | 260 L | 20 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 175x | -218L |
1.6i 16V | 260 L | 27 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 163x | -218L |
1.6i GSI 16V | 260 L | 29 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 163x | -218L |
1.7 D | 260 L | 17 L to 1 s | 5.7x | 154x | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.2i 16V |
---|---|
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 217x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.2i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 218x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.4i 16V |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 25 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.4i |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 18 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.4 Si |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 22 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 187x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.5 D |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 14 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.5 TD |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 20 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 175x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 27 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.6i GSI 16V |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 29 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 163x |
Difference with world average | -218L |
Vehicle | 1.7 D |
Trunk space | 260 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | 17 L to 1 s |
Trunk space to tank size | 5.7x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 154x |
Difference with world average | -218L |