Vehicle | Trunk space | Trunk to acceleration ratio | Trunk space to tank size | Trunk space to engine capacity | Difference with world average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.8 | 280 L | - | 4x | 101x | -198L |
3.0 V6 | 280 L | - | - | 94x | -198L |
3.0 | 280 L | - | 4x | 94x | -198L |
Vehicle | 2.8 |
---|---|
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 101x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | - |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 94x |
Difference with world average | -198L |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Trunk space | 280 L |
Trunk to acceleration ratio | - |
Trunk space to tank size | 4x |
Trunk space to engine capacity | 94x |
Difference with world average | -198L |