Vauxhall Vectra Trunk Space in Quick-to-Read Graphs

Average space for all generations

Quick notes on Vauxhall Vectra trunk space

    • Trunk capacity for generation: 530 L
    • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.8 pcs
    • Amount of average suitcases: 5.3 pcs
    • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 106 L
    • Max trunk load: 84 kg
    • Interior transformation: flexible
    • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.1 L to 1 hp
    • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.9 to 1 Nm
    • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.3 L/hp (3.1 L/kW)
  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 3 L/hp (4.1 L/kW)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 4.3 L/hp (5.9 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 2.36 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.38 L/km-h (1.48 L/mph)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 2.59 L/km-h (1.61 L/mph)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 2.66 L/km-h (1.65 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 51x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 75.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 76.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 60.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 63.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 67.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC 530 L 75 L to 1 s 8.8x 190x +52L
    1.9 CDTi ECOTEC 530 L - 8.8x 277x +52L
    3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC 530 L - 8.8x 179x +52L
    2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC 530 L - 8.8x 265x +52L
    2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC 530 L - - 241x +52L
    1.8i 16V ECOTEC 530 L 46 L to 1 s - 295x +52L
    Vehicle 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 75 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 190x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 277x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 265x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average +52L
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V ECOTEC
    Trunk space 530 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 295x
    Difference with world average +52L

    Quick notes on Vauxhall Vectra trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 500 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 100 L
      • Max trunk load: 79 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)
  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 2.51 L/km-h (1.56 L/mph)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)
  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.01 L/km-h (1.25 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 2.45 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 87.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 66.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 72.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 45.9x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 58.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    1.9 CDTi ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 262x +22L
    2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC 500 L - - 227x +22L
    3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 169x +22L
    2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 179x +22L
    2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 250x +22L
    1.8i 16V ECOTEC 500 L 50 L to 1 s - 278x +22L
    Vehicle 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 262x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 227x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 278x
    Difference with world average +22L

    Quick notes on Vauxhall Vectra trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 500 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 11.1 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 5 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 100 L
      • Max trunk load: 78 kg
      • Interior transformation: limited
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 1.8 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.9 L/hp (3.9 L/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 4.2 L/hp (5.7 L/kW)
  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.2 L/hp (3 L/kW)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 3.2 L/hp (4.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.17 L/km-h (1.35 L/mph)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 2.45 L/km-h (1.52 L/mph)
  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 2.51 L/km-h (1.56 L/mph)
  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 2.01 L/km-h (1.25 L/mph)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 2.3 L/km-h (1.43 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC : 72.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC : 58.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8i 16V ECOTEC : 65.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC : 87.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC : 48.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC : 66.7x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 169x +22L
    2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 250x +22L
    1.8i 16V ECOTEC 500 L 50 L to 1 s - 278x +22L
    1.9 CDTi ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 262x +22L
    2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC 500 L - 8.3x 179x +22L
    2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC 500 L - - 227x +22L
    Vehicle 3.0 V6 CDTi 24V ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 169x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V Turbo ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 250x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 50 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 278x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 1.9 CDTi ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 262x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 2.8i V6 24V Turbo ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size 8.3x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 179x
    Difference with world average +22L
    Vehicle 2.2i 16V Direct ECOTEC
    Trunk space 500 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio -
    Trunk space to tank size -
    Trunk space to engine capacity 227x
    Difference with world average +22L

    Quick notes on Vauxhall Vectra trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 460 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.2 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.6 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 92 L
      • Max trunk load: 81 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 3.8 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.5 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.5i V6 : 2.7 L/hp (3.7 L/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V : 4 L/hp (5.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V : 3.4 L/hp (4.6 L/kW)
  • 1.6i 16V : 4.6 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 1.6i : 6.1 L/hp (8.4 L/kW)
  • 2.0 DI 16V : 5.6 L/hp (7.7 L/kW)
  • 2.0 DTI 16V : 4.6 L/hp (6.2 L/kW)
  • 2.5i GSi : 2.4 L/hp (3.2 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.5i V6 : 2.07 L/km-h (1.29 L/mph)
  • 1.8i 16V : 2.36 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V : 2.22 L/km-h (1.38 L/mph)
  • 1.6i 16V : 2.56 L/km-h (1.59 L/mph)
  • 1.6i : 2.75 L/km-h (1.71 L/mph)
  • 2.0 DI 16V : 2.71 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)
  • 2.0 DTI 16V : 2.46 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 2.5i GSi : 1.95 L/km-h (1.21 L/mph)
    Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.5i V6 460 L 53 L to 1 s 7.7x 184x -18L
    1.8i 16V 460 L 40 L to 1 s 7.7x 256x -18L
    2.0i 16V 460 L 48 L to 1 s 7.7x 230x -18L
    1.6i 16V 460 L 37 L to 1 s 7.7x 288x -18L
    1.6i 460 L 28 L to 1 s 7.7x 288x -18L
    2.0 DI 16V 460 L 28 L to 1 s 7.7x 231x -18L
    2.0 DTI 16V 460 L 35 L to 1 s 7.7x 231x -18L
    2.5i GSi 460 L 59 L to 1 s 7.7x 184x -18L
    Vehicle 2.5i V6
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 53 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 184x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 256x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 48 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 230x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 37 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 288x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.0 DI 16V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 28 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.0 DTI 16V
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 35 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 231x
    Difference with world average -18L
    Vehicle 2.5i GSi
    Trunk space 460 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 7.7x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 184x
    Difference with world average -18L

    Quick notes on Vauxhall Vectra trunk space

      • Trunk capacity for generation: 480 L
      • Amount of carry-on suitcases: 10.7 pcs
      • Amount of average suitcases: 4.8 pcs
      • Trunk space per 1 passenger: 96 L
      • Max trunk load: 77 kg
      • Interior transformation: flexible
      • Horsepower to trunk space: 4.1 L to 1 hp
      • Torque to trunk capacity: 2.6 to 1 Nm
      • Trunkley rating: 8 / 10

    Trunk space to engine power ratio

  • 2.5i V6 : 2.8 L/hp (3.8 L/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V : 4.1 L/hp (5.6 L/kW)
  • 2.0i 16V : 3.5 L/hp (4.8 L/kW)
  • 1.6i : 6.4 L/hp (8.7 L/kW)
  • 1.7 TD : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 1.6i 16V : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 2.0 Di 16V : 5.9 L/hp (8 L/kW)
  • 2.0 DTi 16V : 4.8 L/hp (6.5 L/kW)
  • 2.5i GSi : 2.5 L/hp (3.4 L/kW)

    Trunk size and maximum speed comparison

  • 2.5i V6 : 2.09 L/km-h (1.3 L/mph)
  • 1.8i 16V : 2.36 L/km-h (1.47 L/mph)
  • 2.0i 16V : 2.23 L/km-h (1.39 L/mph)
  • 1.6i : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 1.7 TD : 2.74 L/km-h (1.7 L/mph)
  • 1.6i 16V : 2.55 L/km-h (1.58 L/mph)
  • 2.0 Di 16V : 2.7 L/km-h (1.68 L/mph)
  • 2.0 DTi 16V : 2.46 L/km-h (1.53 L/mph)
  • 2.5i GSi : 2.03 L/km-h (1.26 L/mph)

    Trunk capacity to fuel consumption ratio

  • 2.5i V6 : 47.5x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.8i 16V : 57.1x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0i 16V : 55.8x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.6i : 71.6x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 1.7 TD : 76.2x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 Di 16V : 81.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • 2.0 DTi 16V : 81.4x (Trunk/Consumption)
  • Vehicle Trunk space Trunk to acceleration ratio Trunk space to tank size Trunk space to engine capacity Difference with world average
    2.5i V6 480 L 59 L to 1 s 8x 192x +2L
    1.8i 16V 480 L 46 L to 1 s 8x 267x +2L
    2.0i 16V 480 L 51 L to 1 s 8x 240x +2L
    1.6i 480 L 33 L to 1 s 8x 300x +2L
    1.7 TD 480 L 33 L to 1 s 8x 285x +2L
    1.6i 16V 480 L 40 L to 1 s 8x 300x +2L
    2.0 Di 16V 480 L 33 L to 1 s 8x 241x +2L
    2.0 DTi 16V 480 L 39 L to 1 s 8x 241x +2L
    2.5i GSi 480 L 62 L to 1 s 8x 192x +2L
    Vehicle 2.5i V6
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 59 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 46 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 267x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 51 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 240x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.7 TD
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 285x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 40 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 300x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 Di 16V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 33 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.0 DTi 16V
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 39 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 241x
    Difference with world average +2L
    Vehicle 2.5i GSi
    Trunk space 480 L
    Trunk to acceleration ratio 62 L to 1 s
    Trunk space to tank size 8x
    Trunk space to engine capacity 192x
    Difference with world average +2L